Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

05:04
An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
Published on: October 4, 2018
7.1K
Investigating anticipatory processes during sequentially changing reward prospect: An ERP study
Kerstin Fröber1, Vanessa Jurczyk1, Jonathan Mendl1
1Department of Psychology, University of Regensburg, Germany.
Brain and Cognition
|November 3, 2021
Summary
Reward prospect influences task switching. High, repeating rewards increase stability, while increasing rewards boost cognitive flexibility by altering brain activity. This reveals how reward expectations shape decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Decision Science
Background:
- Voluntary task switching involves a balance between stability and flexibility.
- Reward prospect is known to influence cognitive control, but the precise mechanisms are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how reward expectations modulate the stability-flexibility balance in voluntary task switching.
- To explore the neural mechanisms underlying reward anticipation and its impact on cognitive control using event-related potentials.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments were conducted involving voluntary task switching.
- Reward cue-locked event-related potentials (P2, P3b, CNV) were measured to assess neural responses to varying reward magnitudes and sequences.
Main Results:
- The P2 component showed a stronger response to high reward anticipation, indicating an early attentional boost.
- The P3b amplitude varied with reward sequence (increase > remain-high > low), reflecting working memory updating and motivational arousal.
- The CNV amplitude was sensitive to reward magnitude and sequence, with lower amplitudes when rewards were consistently low, suggesting effort-based preparatory control.
Conclusions:
- Early attentional processes are enhanced by the magnitude of anticipated reward.
- Later cognitive processes, including working memory and preparatory control, are modulated by both reward magnitude and its immediate history.
- Reward expectations dynamically shape the stability-flexibility balance during voluntary task switching through distinct neural mechanisms.
Related Concept Videos
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
173
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
173
Law of Effect
1.8K
B.F. Skinner, a prominent figure in behavioral psychology, introduced operant conditioning by emphasizing the role of consequences in shaping behavior. This theory builds upon the law of effect proposed by Edward Thorndike, which posits that behaviors followed by satisfying outcomes are likely to be repeated. In contrast, those followed by unsatisfying outcomes are less likely to recur.
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
Edward Thorndike's foundational work involved studying learning in animals, particularly using puzzle...
1.8K

