Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

05:40
Comparison of Scale in a Photosynthetic Reactor System for Algal Remediation of Wastewater
Published on: March 6, 2017
9.2K
Towards better process management in wastewater treatment plants: Process analytics based on SHAP values for
Dong Wang1, Sven Thunéll2, Ulrika Lindberg2
1Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, SE, 901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
Journal of Environmental Management
|November 4, 2021
Summary
This study enhances machine learning for wastewater treatment by comparing three models and SHAP interpretation. XGBoost models optimally predict effluent quality, outperforming Random Forest for better process control.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Water Treatment Technologies
- Machine Learning Applications
Background:
- Understanding pollutant removal in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) is vital for effluent quality.
- Complex interactions within WWTPs often obscure process comprehension.
- Previous machine learning (ML) efforts lacked granular interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To upgrade an ML framework for uncovering cause-and-effect relationships in WWTPs.
- To compare the performance of three interpretable tree-based models (RF, XGBoost, LightGBM) using multiple metrics.
- To apply an advanced interpretation system (SHAP) for detailed process insights.
Main Methods:
- Implemented an upgraded ML framework with RF, XGBoost, and LightGBM models.
- Utilized R², RMSE, and MAE metrics for model evaluation.
- Employed SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for granular interpretation of operational factors and effluent parameters.
- Demonstrated the framework using a case study from Umeå WWTP, Sweden.
Main Results:
- XGBoost models demonstrated optimal performance for predicting Total Suspended Solids (TSSe) and Phosphate (PO4e) in effluent.
- Random Forest models showed suboptimal performance due to overfitting and polarized fitting.
- SHAP analysis provided granular insights into cause-and-effect relationships for individual instances.
Conclusions:
- The upgraded ML framework with XGBoost and SHAP offers superior interpretability and predictive power for WWTPs.
- Model comparison requires multiple perspectives and granular interpretation methods like SHAP for comprehensive understanding.
- Findings offer significant insights for controlling TSSe and PO4e in WWTPs and inform broader ML applications in process industries.
Keywords:
Interpretable AIMachine learningProcess analyticsSHapley additive exPlanationsWastewater treatment
