Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Prolonged Emergency Department Stay at Referring Facilities: A Poor Trauma Performance Improvement Tool
Pascal Udekwu1,2, Brian Simonson3,2, Anquonette Stiles1,2
110848WakeMed Health and Hospitals, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Delays in transferring injured patients do not increase mortality. Early transfer of critically ill patients improves survival. Performance improvement review should focus on abnormal vital signs and Glasgow Coma Score-Motor component within a shorter timeframe.
Area of Science:
- Trauma surgery
- Emergency medicine
- Public health
Background:
- Delayed patient transfers may increase morbidity and mortality.
- Initiatives aim to reduce emergency department length of stay (LOS) at referring facilities (RF).
- Current performance improvement (PI) metrics using RF LOS >4 hours have limited improvement opportunities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of referring facility LOS on patient outcomes.
- To identify key variables for performance improvement in trauma patient transfers.
- To assess trends in mortality and hospital LOS over time.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of a statewide trauma registry (2013-2018).
- Inclusion of 13,721 nongeriatric adult transfer patients with ED LOS <12 hours.
- Use of descriptive and inferential statistics, including logistic regression, to analyze prehospital and RF data, vital signs (VS), Glasgow Coma Score-Motor component (GCS-M), mortality, hospital LOS (HLOS), and ICU LOS.
Main Results:
- Mortality decreased over time across all injury severity groups.
- Abnormal GCS-M and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were strongly correlated with mortality.
- Increased mortality related to RF LOS was observed only for abnormal SBP; abnormal SBP and GCS-M were associated with the longest HLOS and ICU LOS.
Conclusions:
- The >4-hour RF LOS metric for PI is not supported by the data.
- Improved survival is attributed to the timely transfer of high-risk patients.
- PI review should focus on transfer patients with abnormal GCS-M and SBP within a more focused timeframe.
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...
Restorative Care

