Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 24, 2026

09:04
Sequence-specific and Selective Recognition of Double-stranded RNAs over Single-stranded RNAs by Chemically Modified Peptide Nucleic Acids
Published on: September 21, 2017
9.7K
Peptide nucleic acid-dependent artifact can lead to false-positive triplex gene editing signals
Pui Yan Ho1,2, Zhen Zhang3, Mark E Hayes3
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology, Oncology, Stem Cell Transplantation and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
Summary
Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) gene editing shows false positives due to PNA-ssDNA aggregation, impacting sickle cell disease and SCID research. Careful assessment is crucial for accurate gene editing technology evaluation.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Gene Editing Technologies
- Nanomedicine
Background:
- Triplex gene editing utilizes peptide nucleic acid (PNA) binding to chromosomal targets to facilitate site-specific recombination with single-strand DNA (ssDNA) donor templates for gene correction.
- Poly Lactic-co-Glycolic Acid (PLGA)-based nanoparticles offer a potential delivery method for PNA and ssDNA donor templates in gene therapy applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of codelivered PNA and ssDNA donor templates via PLGA nanoparticles for correcting sickle cell disease and x-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).
- To identify and characterize potential artifacts in PNA-mediated gene editing assessments.
Main Methods:
- Encapsulation of PNA and ssDNA donor templates within PLGA nanoparticles for codelivery.
- In vitro and in vivo assessment of gene correction in models of sickle cell disease and x-linked SCID.
- Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) artifact analysis to detect PNA-ssDNA aggregation.
Main Results:
- Codelivery of PNA and ssDNA donor templates, but not individual agents, resulted in varying degrees of aggregation.
- This aggregation led to reproducible false-positive PCR signals in vitro, indicating artifactual gene correction.
- PNA sequences showing high in vitro correction did not demonstrate efficacy in vivo, underscoring the artifact's impact.
Conclusions:
- PNA-ssDNA aggregation is a significant source of false-positive results in PNA-mediated gene editing assessments.
- Eliminating ssDNA donor template carryover and interrogating aggregation are critical for validating gene editing technologies.
- This finding emphasizes the need for rigorous validation of PNA-mediated gene editing approaches in preclinical models.
Related Concept Videos
Proofreading
Synthesis of new DNA molecules starts when DNA polymerase links nucleotides together in a sequence that is complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity for the correct base to ensure fidelity in DNA replication. The DNA polymerase furthermore proofreads during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.Errors during Replication Are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase EnzymeGenomic DNA is synthesized in...
Proofreading
Synthesis of new DNA molecules is carried out by the enzyme DNA polymerase, which adds nucleotides on the daughter strand complementary to the template DNA strand. DNA polymerase has a higher affinity to add the correct base and ensures fidelity during DNA replication. Furthermore, it exhibits proofreading activity during replication, using an exonuclease domain that cuts off incorrect nucleotides from the nascent DNA strand.
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase Enzyme
Errors During Replication are Corrected by the DNA Polymerase Enzyme

