Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

198
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
198
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials01:12

Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials

885
Statistical software is pivotal in data analysis and clinical trials by providing tools to analyze data, draw conclusions, and make predictions. These software packages range from simple data management applications to complex analytical platforms, supporting various statistical tests, models, and simulation techniques. Their significance lies in their ability to handle vast amounts of data with precision and efficiency, enabling researchers to validate hypotheses, identify trends, and make...
885
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

7.3K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
7.3K
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

9.7K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
9.7K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

13.1K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
13.1K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.6K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Proteomic and Peptidomic Response of Wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) to Drought Stress.

Plants (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Multi-agent norm perception and induction in distributed healthcare.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2025
Same author

Modelling diversity in hospital strategies in city-scale ambulance dispatching with coupled game-theoretic model and discrete-event simulation.

Journal of biomedical informatics·2025
Same author

Detection of Pharmaceutical Personal Protective Equipment in Video Stream.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2024
Same author

Mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles for therapeutics of renal tuberculosis.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Machine Learning Methods for Pregnancy and Childbirth Risk Management.

Journal of personalized medicine·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.9K

Statistical Inference for Clustering Results Interpretation in Clinical Practice.

Alexander Kanonirov1, Ksenia Balabaeva1, Sergey Kovalchuk1,2

  • 1ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|November 4, 2021
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new statistical method to understand machine learning clustering results. It helps identify key features that define different groups, improving model interpretability in areas like clinical pathway analysis.

Keywords:
Explainable artificial intelligenceclinical pathwaysclustering interpretationinterpretable machine learningk-meansstatistical inference

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

252

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

15.9K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.3K
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
07:13

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model

Published on: April 18, 2025

252

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Data Science
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Understanding machine learning model outputs, particularly clustering, is crucial for reliable application.
  • Clinical pathway modeling often involves complex datasets requiring effective interpretation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel statistical inference-based method for interpreting clustering results.
  • To apply this method to clinical pathway modeling for enhanced understanding.
  • To identify characteristic features that differentiate clusters.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a statistical inference approach to analyze and describe clusters.
  • Quantified the influence of specific features on cluster distinctions.
  • Applied the method to a clinical pathway dataset.

Main Results:

  • The method successfully described distinct clusters based on feature influence.
  • Characteristic features for each cluster were identified.
  • The approach provided interpretable insights into the clinical pathway data.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed method enhances the interpretability of machine learning clustering.
  • It offers a valuable tool for analyzing complex datasets, such as clinical pathways.
  • The findings support the use of statistical inference for explaining model behavior.