Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery

William F Fearon1, Frederik M Zimmermann1, Bernard De Bruyne1

  • 1From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (W.F.F., M.A.H., A.C.Y.), the Quantitative Sciences Unit (D.L., V.Y.D., M.D.), and the Departments of Health Policy (M.A.H.) and Cardiothoracic Surgery (Y.J.W.), Stanford University, and the Stanford Center for Clinical Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine (K.W.M.), Stanford, and the VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto (W.F.F.) - all in California; Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven (F.M.Z., A.H.M.S., P.A.L.T., N.H.J.P.), and Isala Hospital, Zwolle (J.-H.E.D.) - both in the Netherlands; Cardiovascular Center Aalst, Aalst (B.D.B., F.C.), and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi (A.A.) - both in Belgium; Lausanne University Center Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland (B.D.B.); Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary (Z.P., L.S.); the Clinic of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University, and Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania (G.D., G.K.); Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal (S.M.), and Southlake Regional Health Centre, Newmarket, ON (S.E.S.M.) - both in Canada; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford (R.K.), Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow (K.G.O., N.A.-A.), and Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester (J.S.) - all in the United Kingdom; Danderyd University Hospital (N.Ö.-P.) and Karolinska Institutet (N.Ö.-P., N.W.), Solna, and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg (O.A.) - all in Sweden; Clinical Hospital Centre Zemun, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia (N.J.); Medical Faculty of Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic (P.K.); Kings College Hospital, London (P.M., O.W.); the Atlanta VA Healthcare System, Decatur, GA (K.M.); Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen (T.E.), and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus (E.H.C.) - both in Denmark; Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston (M.J.R.); and Montefiore Medical Center, New York (Y.K.).

Summary

For three-vessel coronary artery disease, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was not found to be noninferior to coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). Outcomes at one year showed higher adverse events with FFR-guided PCI compared to CABG.