Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Reimbursement for Female-Specific Compared With Male-Specific Procedures Over Time
1Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; the Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Center for Health Equity Transformation, and Institute of Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, and the Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Male-specific procedures have higher work relative value units (RVUs) but lower hourly reimbursement than female-specific procedures. While reimbursement for female procedures has improved, a disparity in work value persists.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Surgical Outcomes
- Gender Disparities in Medicine
Background:
- Work relative value units (RVUs) are a key component of physician reimbursement in the United States.
- Previous analyses suggest potential gender-based disparities in compensation for medical procedures.
- Understanding changes in RVUs and compensation over time is crucial for equitable healthcare payment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate changes in per-procedure work RVUs for male- and female-specific surgical procedures over time.
- To compare time-based compensation between male- and female-specific procedures.
- To identify trends in reimbursement equity for sex-specific medical interventions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2015-2018 for 12 pairs of matched sex-specific procedures.
- Compared procedure-assigned RVUs from 2015 with historical data from 1997.
- Calculated procedure compensation using median dollars per RVU and compared with historical specialty-specific data.
Main Results:
- Male-specific procedures had significantly higher median RVUs (25.2 vs 7.5) and longer operative times (136 vs 57 minutes) than female-specific procedures.
- Female-specific procedures had a higher reimbursed hourly rate (RVU/hour), but male-specific procedures yielded higher overall reimbursement per hour ($599/h vs $555/h).
- Per-procedure RVUs increased by 13% for male and 26% for female procedures; reimbursement per RVU decreased 8% for male and increased 14% for female procedures.
Conclusions:
- Increases in RVUs and compensation have led to more equitable reimbursement for female-specific procedures.
- Despite improvements, a disparity in the relative value of work persists, favoring male-specific procedures due to specialty-specific compensation rates.
- Further adjustments in compensation models may be needed to fully address gender-based inequities in surgical reimbursement.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
05:35Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using a Cone-shaped Double-hole Method with Dual-plane Probe Guidance
Published on: June 6, 2025