Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Endobronchial Ultrasound-guided Intratumoral Injection of Cisplatin for the Treatment of Isolated Mediastinal Recurrence of Lung Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2017
Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Triple-Class Exposed Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma:
Sujith Dhanasiri1, Georgia Hollier-Hann2, Catherine Stothard2
1Celgene International Sàrl, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland.
Purpose:
Patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options after exposure to an immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor (PI), and anti-CD38 antibody (triple-class exposure [TCE]). However, current understanding about the management of these patients and associated health care resource use (HCRU) is limited outside the United States. The objective of the International Treatment pattern and resource use Evaluation for Multiple myeloma In a Study of triple-class Exposed patients (ITEMISE) study was to use a physician-developed survey fielded to hematologists across Europe and Canada to assess the treatment, management, HCRU, and end-of-life care for patients with RRMM after TCE.
Methods:
The ITEMISE study used a 3-phase Delphi-like approach that consisted of in-depth interviews with 7 hematology experts; the development of a cross-sectional survey fielded to hematologists across Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom from August to October 2020; and a final workshop of hematology experts to validate the pooled findings. Hematologists were asked to consider the management of patients in the first 3 treatment lines after TCE, including treatment options, treatment duration and outcomes, and frequency of outpatient visits and hospitalizations.
Findings:
The survey was completed by 202 hematologists (60% from academic hospitals, 38% from other public hospitals, and 2% from private hospitals). Hematologists estimated that 55% of patients would receive active treatment after TCE, the equivalent of fourth-line treatment onward since diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Immunomodulatory drug, anti-CD38 antibody plus immunomodulatory drug, and PI-based regimens (received by 22.5%, 17.8%, and 15.1% of patients, respectively) were reported for first treatment strategy after TCE. Pomalidomide, daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and carfilzomib were the most frequently selected antimyeloma agents. Associated outcomes of median overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate for first treatment after TCE were estimated as 12 months, 4 months, and 40%, respectively. HCRU included outpatient visits and unplanned hospitalizations that were commonly reported during treatment after TCE.
Implications:
Findings indicate an intent to actively treat patients after TCE with a range of combination regimens frequently consisting of immunomodulatory drugs, PIs, and anti-CD38 antibodies, highlighting the lack of standard of care and suggesting a large clinical unmet need. Estimated clinical outcomes are consistent with data from US studies and indicate the poor prognosis for patients after TCE. Substantial HCRU is associated with management of patients after TCE across Europe and Canada, signifying a high patient and societal impact and a need for better treatment options to reduce this burden.
Insights
Treatment for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after triple-class exposure (TCE) shows limited standard of care. Patients face poor prognosis and substantial healthcare resource use, indicating a need for improved therapies.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have undergone triple-class exposure (TCE) have limited treatment options and a poor prognosis.
- Understanding treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) for these patients outside the US is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess treatment, management, HCRU, and end-of-life care for RRMM patients post-TCE in Europe and Canada.
- To identify treatment patterns and unmet needs in RRMM management after TCE.
Main Methods:
- A Delphi-like approach involving expert interviews and a cross-sectional survey of 202 hematologists across Europe and Canada.
- Survey focused on treatment strategies, outcomes, and HCRU for patients receiving their first treatment after TCE.
Main Results:
- 55% of RRMM patients received active treatment post-TCE, with immunomodulatory drugs, anti-CD38 antibodies, and proteasome inhibitors being common.
- Median overall survival was 12 months, progression-free survival was 4 months, and objective response rate was 40% for the first treatment post-TCE.
- Active treatment post-TCE involves diverse regimens, with significant outpatient visits and hospitalizations reported.
Conclusions:
- There is a lack of a standardized treatment approach for RRMM patients post-TCE, highlighting a significant unmet clinical need.
- Clinical outcomes for RRMM patients post-TCE in Europe and Canada mirror those in the US, indicating a poor prognosis.
- The management of RRMM patients post-TCE is associated with substantial HCRU, emphasizing the need for more effective therapies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...

