Toward intersectional and culturally relevant sex and gender analysis in health research
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Sarah Rotz1, Johnathan Rose2, Jeff Masuda3
1Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract:
Current institutional frameworks in sex- and gender-based analysis (SGBA) are promising, but significant gaps remain in their relation to recent developments in research praxis. In this paper we draw from our own experiences with a national health research funding agency, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), to critically examine the uptake and implementation of its current frameworks and practices of sex and gender analysis in health research. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a cohort of 18 health researchers alongside an institutional policy analysis to show how sex and gender have been understood, integrated, and addressed within the agency and initiative. Our findings reveal that attention to date has focused on representation (human and data) while deeper justice issues that are attentive to intersectionality, positionality and reflexivity-remain ambiguous. Finally, we discuss possible strategies for institutions to improve the uptake of knowledge, training, and policy to better support intersectional and culturally-relevant frameworks across the diverse research community.
Related Concept Videos
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Dimensions of Health and Illness
The Role of Culture
Horney's Sociocultural Approach
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development

