Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Author Spotlight: Self-Assessment Protocol for Predicting Psoriatic Arthritis in Psoriasis Patients
Published on: March 1, 2024
Small differences in EQ-5D-5L health utility scores were interpreted differently between and within respondents
Nathan S McClure1, Feng Xie2, Mike Paulden3
1School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, T6G 1C9, Alberta, Canada; Alberta PROMs and EQ-5D Research and Support Unit (APERSU), University of Alberta, 8602 112 Street, Edmonton, T6G 2E1, Alberta, Canada.
Objectives:
This study aims to determine how population-based health-utility score (HUS) differences reflect individuals' health preferences using responses from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L Valuation Study, including time trade-off (TTO) and discrete-choice experiment (DCE) tasks (n = 1073).
Study Design And Setting:
Cardinal TTO responses were transformed into pairwise comparisons to yield ordinal TTO responses. We investigated how EQ-5D-5L HUS differences differ from participants' stated cardinal preferences, and determined the smallest HUS difference that may be expected to represent participants' ordinal preferences.
Results:
HUS differences near zero have 30.6% (95% confidence interval: 29.1-31.9%) probability of representing a tie in individuals' TTO values. Differences in EQ-5D-5L HUS of -0.054 (-0.071 to -0.029) and 0.047 (0.026-0.076) maximized the sensitivity and specificity of discriminating transitions to worse/better health states. For small HUS differences of ±0.03 to ±0.07, the magnitude of respondents' average TTO difference on the cardinal scale was 0.17 and 0.35 whether ties were included or excluded, respectively. Absolute HUS differences between 0.042 and 0.062 had a 50% probability of representing respondents' ordinal preferences.
Conclusion:
A HUS needs to be large enough to reflect individuals' stated health preferences, which may lend support to the application of a minimally important difference for decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation
Regression Toward the Mean
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...

