Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:33

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry

7.2K
Tandem mass spectrometry, also known as MS/MS or MS2, is an analytical technique that employs two mass analyzers. Essentially it is a series of mass spectrometers that helps isolate a particular biomolecule and then helps study its chemical properties.
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...
7.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the Performance of Photon- and Electron-Based Fragmentation Methods in Omnitrap-LCMS Analysis of <i>N</i>-Glycopeptides.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Spatial distribution of the proteome in the human body and in cancers.

Nature·2026
Same author

The inner nuclear membrane protein SUN1 regulates cullin-3 neddylation to maintain insulin signaling.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Small-molecule binding-site discovery using silyl ether-enabled chemoproteomics.

Nature chemistry·2026
Same author

Integration of alternative fragmentation techniques into standard LC-MS workflows using a single deep learning model enhances proteome coverage.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Analysis of isobaric quantitative proteomic data using TMT-Integrator and FragPipe computational platform.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

A Spin-Tip Enrichment Strategy for Simultaneous Analysis of N-Glycopeptides and Phosphopeptides from Human Pancreatic Tissues
09:16

A Spin-Tip Enrichment Strategy for Simultaneous Analysis of N-Glycopeptides and Phosphopeptides from Human Pancreatic Tissues

Published on: May 4, 2022

2.4K

Deep-Learning-Derived Evaluation Metrics Enable Effective Benchmarking of Computational Tools for Phosphopeptide

Wen Jiang1, Bo Wen1, Kai Li1

  • 1Lester and Sue Smith Breast Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP
|November 5, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Computational pipelines for phosphoproteomics yield varied results. New deep-learning metrics like phosphosite probability, Delta RT, and spectral similarity effectively benchmark pipeline performance for accurate phosphopeptide identification and localization.

Keywords:
Benchmarkdeep learningphosphopeptide identificationphosphoproteomics

More Related Videos

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors
10:17

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors

Published on: April 29, 2022

2.6K
Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools
07:01

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools

Published on: August 19, 2025

244

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

A Spin-Tip Enrichment Strategy for Simultaneous Analysis of N-Glycopeptides and Phosphopeptides from Human Pancreatic Tissues
09:16

A Spin-Tip Enrichment Strategy for Simultaneous Analysis of N-Glycopeptides and Phosphopeptides from Human Pancreatic Tissues

Published on: May 4, 2022

2.4K
A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors
10:17

A Mass Spectrometry-Based Approach to Identify Phosphoprotein Phosphatases and their Interactors

Published on: April 29, 2022

2.6K
Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools
07:01

Navigating the Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Data Using Free Computational Tools

Published on: August 19, 2025

244

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Computational Biology
  • Proteomics

Background:

  • Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) enables global phosphorylation analysis.
  • Existing computational pipelines for phosphoproteomics show significant discrepancies in phosphopeptide identification and site localization.
  • A lack of robust evaluation metrics hinders the comparison and improvement of these pipelines, especially for real-world cancer study data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the critical need for benchmarking computational pipelines in MS/MS-based phosphoproteomics.
  • To investigate and validate deep-learning-derived features as reliable evaluation metrics for phosphopeptide identification and phosphosite localization.
  • To provide a standardized approach for comparing the performance of different computational pipelines using real-world phosphoproteomic datasets.

Main Methods:

  • Investigated three deep-learning features: phosphosite probability (MusiteDeep), Delta Retention Time (RT) (AutoRT), and spectral similarity (pDeep2).
  • Evaluated these features using a synthetic peptide dataset to assess their ability to distinguish correct from incorrect peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs), including those with incorrect localization.
  • Applied the validated features to benchmark diverse computational pipelines on multiple phosphoproteomic datasets.

Main Results:

  • Delta RT and spectral similarity effectively discriminated between correct and incorrect PSMs, even when only phosphosite localization was incorrect.
  • The three deep-learning-derived features proved useful for benchmarking the performance of various computational pipelines across different phosphoproteomic datasets.
  • Demonstrated the utility of these metrics in comparing pipeline accuracy for both peptide identification and site localization.

Conclusions:

  • Deep-learning-derived features (phosphosite probability, Delta RT, spectral similarity) serve as effective metrics for benchmarking phosphoproteomic computational pipelines.
  • These metrics enable users to select appropriate pipelines and parameters for phosphoproteomics data analysis.
  • The study provides guidance for developers to enhance computational methods for improved phosphoproteomics research.