Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Optimization of spin-lock times in T1ρ mapping of knee cartilage: Cramér-Rao bounds versus matched sampling-fitting
Marcelo V W Zibetti1, Azadeh Sharafi1, Ravinder R Regatte1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Purpose:
To compare different optimization approaches for choosing the spin-lock times (TSLs), in spin-lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame (T1ρ ) mapping.
Methods:
Optimization criteria for TSLs based on Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) are compared with matched sampling-fitting (MSF) approaches for T1ρ mapping on synthetic data, model phantoms, and knee cartilage. The MSF approaches are optimized using robust methods for noisy cost functions. The MSF approaches assume that optimal TSLs depend on the chosen fitting method. An iterative non-linear least squares (NLS) and artificial neural networks (ANN) are tested as two possible T1ρ fitting methods for MSF approaches.
Results:
All optimized criteria were better than non-optimized ones. However, we observe that a modified CRLB and an MSF based on the mean of the normalized absolute error (MNAE) were more robust optimization approaches, performing well in all tested cases. The optimized TSLs obtained the best performance with synthetic data (3.5-8.0% error), model phantoms (1.5-2.8% error), and healthy volunteers (7.7-21.1% error), showing stable and improved quality results, comparing to non-optimized approaches (4.2-13.3% error on synthetic data, 2.1-6.2% error on model phantoms, 9.8-27.8% error on healthy volunteers).
Conclusion:
A modified CRLB and the MSF based on MNAE are robust optimization approaches for choosing TSLs in T1ρ mapping. All optimized criteria allowed good results even using rapid scans with two TSLs when a complex-valued fitting is done with iterative NLS or ANN.
Related Concept Videos
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Atomic Nuclei: Types of Nuclear Relaxation
In spin–lattice or longitudinal relaxation, the excited spins exchange energy with the surrounding lattice as they return to the lower energy level. Among several mechanisms that contribute to spin–lattice relaxation, magnetic dipolar interactions are significant. Here, the excited nucleus transfers...
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

