Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Laparoscopic-Assisted Seldinger Technique for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion
Published on: May 23, 2025
Effect of sutureless securement on hemodialysis catheter-related bloodstream infection
Keiji Fujimoto1, Emi Iida2,3, Syo Kumano4
1Department of Nephrology, Kanazawa Medical University School of Medicine, 1-1 Daigaku, Uchinada, Ishikawa, 920-0293, Japan. k-2210@kanazawa-med.ac.jp.
Insights
Sutureless securement devices like GRIP-LOK may lower the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in hemodialysis patients. This study found GRIP-LOK significantly reduced CRBSI compared to traditional sutures for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is a significant complication in hemodialysis patients.
- Sutureless securement devices may prevent CRBSI by reducing catheter dislodgement and exit-site infections.
- The efficacy of sutureless devices for hemodialysis catheters remains under-investigated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of the GRIP-LOK sutureless securement device compared to conventional sutures in preventing CRBSI in patients with non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters (NTHCs).
Main Methods:
- A single-center retrospective observational study analyzed 211 NTHCs in 110 hemodialysis inpatients.
- Patients were divided into two groups: conventional skin sutures (Suture group, n=121) and GRIP-LOK (GRIP-LOK group, n=90).
- The stabilized inverse probability of treatment (SIPT)-weighting method was employed to adjust for 12 potential CRBSI predictors, followed by univariate SIPT-weighted Cox proportional regression analysis.
Main Results:
- The SIPT-weighted analysis revealed a significant reduction in CRBSI risk with GRIP-LOK compared to sutures (Hazard Ratio: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.78, p=0.023).
- GRIP-LOK demonstrated a substantial protective effect against CRBSI development.
Conclusions:
- GRIP-LOK sutureless securement is associated with a lower risk of CRBSI in patients requiring indwelling NTHCs compared to traditional suture securement.
- Sutureless devices represent a promising alternative for enhancing hemodialysis catheter safety.
Abstract:
The use of sutureless securement devices during catheterization might reduce the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) by suppressing catheter-exit infection and catheter dislodgement. However, the effectiveness of these devices in reducing CRBSI risk when securing hemodialysis catheters has not been explored. This single-center retrospective observational study examined 211 non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters (NTHCs) from 110 hemodialysis inpatients, of which 121 were secured using conventional skin sutures (Suture group) and 90 with GRIP-LOK (GRIP-LOK group). The stabilized inverse probability of treatment (SIPT)-weighting method was used to generate a new population (SIPT-weighted model) without group differences for each of the 12 predictors of CRBSI development (i.e., age, sex, dialysis history, concomitant acute kidney injury or diabetes, concurrent use of immunosuppressant drugs or aspirin, NTHC insertion site, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, carriage, bacteremia event within 3 months before catheterization, hemoglobin level, and serum albumin titer). The effect of GRIP-LOK compared with sutures on CRBSI in the SIPT-weighted model was evaluated using univariate SIPT-weighted Cox proportional regression analysis, which showed a significant CRBSI suppression effect of GRIP-LOK compared with sutures (hazard ratio: 0.17 [95% CI 0.04-0.78], p = 0.023). GRIP-LOK affords a lower risk of CRBSI due to indwelling NTHCs than conventional securement using sutures.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Peritoneal Dialysis II: Peritoneal Dialysis Systems and Complications
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management

