Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Treatment with Locking Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fracture of the Femur Utilizing a New Awl with a Distal Positioner
Published on: June 6, 2025
Are small-diameter intramedullary nails enough for treating simple diaphyseal tibial fractures? A comparative study
Fady Kamal Bedeir1, Mostafa Ahmed Shawky Mohamed1, Mohamed Muhmoud Hegazy1
1Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Kasr Alainy, Giza, Egypt.
Purpose:
The aim of our study was to compare the results of using small-diameter versus large-diameter interlocking reamed intramedullary nails in treatment of simple tibial shaft fractures.
Methods:
This prospective randomized control trial involved 60 patients, divided into two groups, Group A (Small IMN) (10 mm in males and 9 mm in females) and Group B (Large IMN) (12 mm in males and 11 mm in females). All patients were followed up for at least 1 year.
Results:
The mean operative time in Group A was 79 min versus 94.6 min in Group B. The mean time of radiological exposure in Group A was 2.27 min compared to 3.73 min in Group B. The mean union time in Group A was 15.2 weeks, while in Group B, the mean union time was 12.8 weeks. Implant failure (screw breakage or nail breakage) or nonunion did not occur in any case in the two groups.
Conclusion:
Small IMN showed comparable clinical and radiological results to large IMN with lesser operative and radioscopic time. We can recommend that small IMN should be used more often in treating simple stable tibial fractures.
More Related Videos
07:41An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016
06:41A Minimally Invasive Model to Analyze Endochondral Fracture Healing in Mice Under Standardized Biomechanical Conditions
Published on: March 22, 2018