Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
A 3-Biomarker 2-Point-Based Risk Stratification Strategy in Acute Heart Failure
Jesús Álvarez-García1,2, Álvaro García-Osuna3, Miquel Vives-Borrás1
1Cardiology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIb-SantPau, Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Barcelona, Spain.
Measuring N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) at admission and discharge improves heart failure mortality prediction. This 3-biomarker panel identifies four distinct risk categories for 12-month mortality.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomarker Research
- Prognostic Modeling
Background:
- Single-point biomarker measurements limit prognostic accuracy in acute heart failure (HF).
- Evaluating dynamic changes and combinations of biomarkers is crucial for improved risk stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the prognostic value of NT-proBNP, hsTnT, Cys-C, hs-CRP, GDF15, and GAL-3 in HF patients at admission and discharge.
- To determine if a multi-biomarker approach improves 12-month mortality prediction compared to clinical models and existing scores.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, multicenter registry of 830 acute HF patients.
- Primary outcome: 12-month mortality.
- Statistical analysis included C-index, calibration, Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) on top of clinical models and established scores.
Main Results:
- The combination of NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 at admission and discharge significantly improved 12-month mortality prediction (C-index 0.782, IDI 5%, NRI 57%).
- This 3-biomarker panel successfully stratified patients into four distinct risk categories for 12-month mortality.
- The novel model outperformed both the best clinical model and four commonly used risk scores.
Conclusions:
- A multi-biomarker model incorporating NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, and GDF-15 measured dynamically (admission and discharge) offers superior prognostic prediction in acute HF.
- This approach provides a more accurate and refined risk stratification tool for 12-month mortality compared to current methods.
More Related Videos
04:05Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
10:03Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations