Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Signal Attenuation as a Rat Model of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Published on: January 9, 2015
Risk of Bleeding Associated With Antidepressants: Impact of Causality Assessment and Competition Bias on Signal
René Zeiss1, Bernhard J Connemann1, Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona1
1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy III, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Abstract:
Introduction: Until now, methods of pharmacovigilance as disproportionality analysis were not capable of proving the otherwise well-established increased bleeding risk related to antidepressants (ADs). As bleeding events with ADs often occur in combination with antithrombotics, they might not be considered causative of, but merely "linked" with, the bleeding event. Therefore, we hypothesized that the causality assessment of bleeding events in association with ADs and the competitive impact of antithrombotics are factors contributing to the non-findings of previous pharmacovigilance studies. Methods: We performed a case/non-case study based on data from VigiBaseTM and calculated reporting odds ratios (RORs) for 25 ADs. We used individual case safety reports (ICSRs) that were differently categorized in the database regarding their type of association between drug and event. Furthermore, we investigated the competitive impact of antithrombotics by comparing RORs with and without ICSRs related to antithrombotics. Results: Analysis of ICSRs that were categorized as causally associated resulted in the detection of only two signals (citalopram and escitalopram; upper gastrointestinal bleeding). Analysis of ICSRs irrespective of the type of association resulted in the detection of signals in 8 out of 25 ADs (regarding bleeding, in general, gastrointestinal bleeding and upper gastrointestinal bleeding). Consideration of ICSRs associated with antithrombotics as competitive substances did not have a major impact on signal detection in our analysis. Conclusion: Categorization of the type of association between drug and event affects the results of quantitative signal detection. Causality assessment seems to play a major role in signal detection, probably particularly concerning rare, unknown, or clinically insignificant adverse drug reactions. ADs appear to significantly increase the bleeding risk, even independent of antithrombotic comedication.
More Related Videos
08:42Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
06:55An Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress Protocol for Instigating Depressive Symptoms, Behavioral Changes and Negative Health Outcomes in Rodents
Published on: December 2, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Antidepressant Drugs: Overview
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Antidepressant Drugs: MAOIs and Other Agents
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...