Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
The Need for Special Education Among ELBW and SGA Preterm Children: A Cohort Study
Pauline E van Beek1, Kaylee van de Par1, Iris E van der Horst1
1Department of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands.
Insights
Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants face a higher need for special education. Those who are also small for gestational age (SGA) have the greatest risk for educational challenges.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Preterm infants with growth restriction are at risk for adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes.
- Identifying preterm infants needing educational support is crucial for timely intervention.
- Existing research often focuses on cognitive ability and behavior, necessitating a broader evaluation of school performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the association between extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and the need for special education.
- To determine if being small for gestational age (SGA) confers an additional risk for special education needs in ELBW infants.
- To identify specific risk factors contributing to the need for special education in preterm children.
Main Methods:
- A single-center cohort study followed singleton children born before 30 weeks' gestation (1990-2011) until 2019.
- Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) was defined as <1000g; small for gestational age (SGA) was defined as birth weight <10th percentile.
- The primary outcome was the need for special education at 8 years of age, assessed via a dichotomous measure.
Main Results:
- Of 390 children assessed at 8 years, 56 (14%) required special education, often due to cognitive deficits (43%) or behavioral issues (29%).
- Children with ELBW had a higher need for special education (18%) compared to those without ELBW (11%).
- Infants who were both ELBW and SGA exhibited the highest risk (25%) for needing special education, with an odds ratio of 2.88 compared to ELBW-/SGA- children.
Conclusions:
- Extremely low birth weight (ELBW) is a significant risk factor for requiring special education services.
- The combination of ELBW and small for gestational age (SGA) identifies preterm infants with the most substantial risk for adverse educational outcomes.
- Stratifying preterm infants by ELBW and SGA status aids in early identification and targeted follow-up for those at higher risk.
Abstract:
Background: Preterm infants with pre- or postnatal growth restriction may have an additional risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Whereas reduced cognitive ability and behavioral problems have consistently been associated with prematurity, a more comprehensive evaluation is necessary to identify those preterm infants who are at increased risk for difficulties in school performance. This study evaluated the association between extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and the need for special education and determined if there is an additional risk for the need for special education among small for gestational age (SGA) children. Methods: This is a single-center cohort study including singleton children born below 30 weeks' gestation between 1990 and 2011 and followed into 2019. ELBW + was defined as a birth weight below 1,000 g, which was compared to ELBW-. Within all ELBW+ children, SGA+ was defined as a birth weight <10th percentile according to Fenton, which was compared to SGA-. The dichotomous outcome measurement was the need for special education at 8 years of age or not, reflecting if the children required a special educational setting designed to accommodate educational, behavioral, and/or medical needs. Results: In total, 609 children were eligible for follow-up, of whom 390 (64%) children were assessed at 8 years. Of these, 56 (14%) children needed special education, most often determined by cognitive deficiency (43%), behavioral problems (29%), or both (16%). Among the 191 ELBW+ children, 35 (18%) attended special education, compared to 21 (11%) among ELBW- children (p-value 0.041). A decreasing risk for the need for special education was found from 25% in ELBW+/SGA+ children to 16% in ELBW+/SGA- children and 11% in ELBW-/SGA- children (p-value 0.025). Multivariable logistic regression showed an odds ratio of 2.88 (95% CI 1.20-6.78) for ELBW+/SGA+ children vs. ELBW-/SGA- children for the need for special education. Conclusions: This study showed that ELBW children are at increased risk for the need for special education compared to non-ELBW children. In addition, children that are both ELBW and SGA do have the highest risk for the need for special education. Classifying children as ELBW and SGA can be useful in follow-up for identifying preterm children with an additional risk for adverse long-term outcome.
More Related Videos
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
08:42A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017