Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Survival Tree01:19

Survival Tree

181
Survival trees are a non-parametric method used in survival analysis to model the relationship between a set of covariates and the time until an event of interest occurs, often referred to as the "time-to-event" or "survival time." This method is particularly useful when dealing with censored data, where the event has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period, or when the exact time of the event is unknown.
 Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
181
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

343
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
343
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.2K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.2K
Contingency Table01:29

Contingency Table

2.7K
A contingency table provides a way of portraying data that can facilitate calculating probabilities. It is a method of displaying a frequency distribution as a table with rows and columns to show how two variables may be dependent (contingent) upon each other; The table helps determine conditional probabilities quite quickly and can help systematically organize, analyze and quantify data. The table displays sample values concerning two variables that may be dependent or contingent on one...
2.7K
Introduction to Test of Independence01:21

Introduction to Test of Independence

2.5K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.5K
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

254
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
254

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural Cardiac Abnormalities, Ventricular Dysfunction Phenotypes, and Heart Failure Risk among Antiretroviral Therapy-treated People Living with HIV in South Africa.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

"Mycophenolate-Based Immunosuppression After Calcineurin-Inhibitor Withdrawal in Liver Transplant Recipients is Safe and Results in Long-Term Improvement in Renal Function".

Clinical transplantation·2026
Same author

Long-Term Glycemic Control and Pharmacotherapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Descriptive Analysis of 10-Year Trends in a Statewide Sample.

Journal of diabetes research·2026
Same author

Association Between Therapeutic Inertia and Future Hypoglycemia Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

Diabetes epidemiology and management·2026
Same author

Changes in nutrition-related health outcomes following a minimum wage increase.

SSM - population health·2026
Same author

Whole Mount Immunostaining of Fetal and Neonatal Mouse Ovaries.

Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.5K

Assessing effect heterogeneity of a randomized treatment using conditional inference trees.

Ashwini Venkatasubramaniam1, Brandon Koch2, Lauren Erickson3

  • 1522468The Alan Turing Institute, The British Library, London, UK.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|November 8, 2021
PubMed
Summary

We developed a new method to find subgroups where treatment effects differ, controlling for false positives. This approach identifies and characterizes patient subgroups with varying treatment responses, crucial for clinical trials.

Keywords:
Causal effectsconditional inference treesmatchingtreatment effect heterogeneity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

801
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
04:35

Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach

Published on: July 3, 2020

3.5K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

801
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Treatment effect heterogeneity is when patient characteristics alter treatment outcomes.
  • Identifying these differences is vital for personalized medicine and efficient clinical trials.
  • Existing methods may struggle with Type I error control or subgroup identification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel statistical approach for characterizing treatment effect heterogeneity.
  • To ensure Type I error rate control when identifying subgroups with differential treatment effects.
  • To provide a method that identifies, characterizes, and estimates treatment effects within subgroups.

Main Methods:

  • Combined prognostic score matching with conditional inference trees.
  • Developed 'Treatment Effect Heterogeneity Trees' (TETHs).
  • Controlled the Type I error rate to prevent false identification of subgroup differences.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method effectively identifies subgroups with heterogeneous treatment effects.
  • It successfully controls the Type I error rate, reducing the risk of false discoveries.
  • Demonstrated efficacy through comprehensive simulations and a real-world nutrition trial dataset.

Conclusions:

  • The TETHs method offers a robust approach to analyzing treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized trials.
  • Its Type I error control is particularly valuable in clinical settings, minimizing costly erroneous conclusions.
  • This technique aids in understanding patient populations and tailoring treatment strategies.