Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Pavlovian Conditioned Approach Training in Rats
Published on: February 4, 2016
A Pavlovian Intervention to Condition Comforting Effects of Fruits
Laura E Finch1, Jenna R Cummings, Sophie C Lee
1From the Academic Research Centers (Finch), NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Social and Behavioral Sciences Branch, Division of Intramural Population Health Research (Cummings), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, Maryland; and Department of Psychology (Lee, Tomiyama), University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Objective:
Perceived stress, lower fruit intake, and comfort eating are all risk factors for chronic disease. The present pilot study aimed to simultaneously mitigate all three risk factors by applying Pavlovian conditioning to change the nature of comfort eating. Specifically, stressed participants underwent a Pavlovian conditioning intervention designed to elicit comforting effects of fruit intake and thereby reduce negative mood while promoting fruit intake.
Methods:
We developed a seven-dose Pavlovian conditioning intervention wherein participants temporally paired together Progressive Muscle Relaxation (unconditioned stimulus) with fruit intake (conditioned stimulus) daily for 1 week. Participants (N = 100, mean [standard deviation] age = 20.7 [4.6] years; 74% female) with moderate to high levels of baseline perceived stress were randomized to the intervention or an active explicitly unpaired control group, wherein the Progressive Muscle Relaxation and fruit intake also occurred but were not temporally paired together. After the intervention, participants' negative mood was assessed immediately before and after fruit intake to assess conditioning effects. Then, participants logged their regular food intake for 4 days using the MyFitnessPal smartphone app.
Results:
After the intervention, fruit intake acutely improved negative mood to a greater extent among the intervention versus control group (F(1,98) = 3.99, p = .048, = 0.039). However, there was not a significant between-group difference in intake of fruit or traditional comfort foods at postintervention.
Conclusions:
Repeated pairing of fruit intake with a reliable distress-reducing activity led to the conditioning of comforting effects of fruit intake. Further refinement of the intervention design is necessary to translate this conditioned association to actual intake of fruit and other foods.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Conditioned Taste Aversion
A notable characteristic of conditioned taste aversion is that it often requires only a single...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Classical Conditioning
Ivan Pavlov observed that dogs...
Classical Conditioning in Daily Life
John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner famously demonstrated the development of fear through classical conditioning in their experiment with Little Albert. They paired the...
Behaviorism
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Principles of Classical Conditioning
During the...

