Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records01:18

Methods of Documentation I: Source-Oriented Records

1.4K
Source-oriented records, or SOR, are medical record-keeping organized by the data source. The SOR system was first developed in the mid-1900s to organize the growing patient data in hospitals and other healthcare facilities.
In an SOR, each discipline involved in patient care maintains a separate medical record section. This record-keeping method enables easy tracking of patient progress and ensures healthcare staff have access to up-to-date information.
Key Attributes include the following:
1.4K
Methods of Documentation III: PIE01:21

Methods of Documentation III: PIE

1.7K
Problem-intervention-evaluation (PIE) is a systematic approach to documentation used in healthcare settings for clinical decision-making and patient care planning. It is a structured approach to organizing patient data based on problems, interventions, and evaluations. Here's a breakdown of its key features and considerations:
1.7K
Methods of Documentation II: POMR01:26

Methods of Documentation II: POMR

1.1K
The Problem-Oriented Medical Record (POMR) revolutionized medical record-keeping by introducing a systematic approach focusing on the patient's problems rather than merely listing symptoms. Dr. Lawrence Weed's introduction of this method in the 1960s marked a significant advancement in medical documentation. The POMR framework consists of four key components: the database, problem list, plan of care, and progress notes.
1.1K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

656
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
656
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.8K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.8K
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR01:30

Methods of Documentation VII: EMR

1.1K
Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) primarily center around electronically documenting patients' health information within a single healthcare organization or practice. They contain essential clinical data related to a patient's medical history, diagnoses, medications, treatment plans, lab results, and other pertinent information relevant to the specific encounter or episode of care. EMRs are designed to streamline documentation and workflow processes within individual healthcare...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breast cancer risk prediction with artificial intelligence: promise, calibration, and clinical readiness.

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026
Same author

Artificial intelligence and computer-aided diagnosis in diagnostic decisions: 5 questions for medical informatics and human-computer interface research.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2025
Same author

Effects of Prior Diagnosis on Second Opinions and Pathologist Viewing Behaviors: Results from a Randomized Trial in Breast Pathology.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2025
Same author

Application of Nudges to Design Clinical Decision Support Tools: Systematic Approach Guided by Implementation Science.

Journal of medical Internet research·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Quality and Understandability of Radiology Report Summaries Generated by ChatGPT: Survey Study.

JMIR formative research·2025
Same author

The Effect of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection on Long-Term Symptoms in the Innovative Support for Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE).

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K

Patients Contributing to Visit Notes: Mixed Methods Evaluation of OurNotes.

Jan Walker1,2, Suzanne Leveille1,3, Gila Kriegel1

  • 1Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.

Journal of Medical Internet Research
|November 8, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The OurNotes intervention, where patients co-generate clinical notes with providers, was well-received by both groups. Patients found it helpful for visit preparation, and clinicians saw it as a positive tool for improving care.

Keywords:
electronic health recordmobile phonepatient portalphysician-patient relationsprevisit information

More Related Videos

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.9K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.4K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

23.9K
A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
07:50

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Published on: September 20, 2018

16.1K

Area of Science:

  • Health Informatics
  • Patient Engagement
  • Clinical Documentation

Background:

  • Patient portals enable access to electronic health records, including clinical notes.
  • The OurNotes intervention facilitates patient-clinician co-generation of clinical notes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess patient and provider experiences with the OurNotes intervention after a 12-month pilot.
  • Evaluate attitudes towards patient-clinician note co-generation in primary care.

Main Methods:

  • A mixed-methods evaluation involving 174 providers and 1962 patients across 4 academic health centers.
  • Patients submitted pre-visit histories and agendas; providers incorporated these into visit notes.
  • Data collected via tracking and post-intervention surveys on usefulness, workflow, and patient/provider feedback.

Main Results:

  • Most clinicians viewed patient histories and agendas positively, with 70% incorporating them into notes.
  • 54% of providers reported no change in visit length, and 35% perceived time savings.
  • Patients found pre-visit submissions helpful for preparation, with high agreement that sending information beforehand was beneficial.

Conclusions:

  • The OurNotes intervention demonstrates patient interest and positive provider reception.
  • Further development requires collaboration with patients, care partners, clinicians, and health record experts.