Evaluation of cerebrovascular hemodynamics in vascular dementia patients with a new individual computational fluid

Jian Xie1, Zaiheng Cheng2, Lihua Gu1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Key Laboratory of Developmental Genes and Human Disease, Affiliated ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Institution of Neuropsychiatry, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210009, China.

Insights

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) offers a non-invasive method to quantitatively assess cerebrovascular hemodynamics. Reduced arterial outlets and increased cerebrovascular resistance are key indicators differentiating subcortical vascular dementia patients from controls.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medical Imaging
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Cerebral hemodynamic disorders are implicated in vascular dementia (VaD) progression.
  • Current methods for detecting hemodynamics are often uncertain.
  • A quantitative computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach is proposed for individual cerebrovascular hemodynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a patient-specific CFD model for quantitative hemodynamic assessment.
  • To identify hemodynamic differences between subcortical vascular dementia (SVaD) patients and cognitive normal controls (CNCs).
  • To explore the association of hemodynamic parameters with SVaD.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed patient-specific CFD models using MRA and ultrasound Doppler data.
  • Calculated hemodynamic indexes: cerebral arterial volume (CAV), arterial outlets, total cerebral blood flow (tCBF), and total cerebrovascular resistance (tCVR).
  • Compared hemodynamic parameters between 38 SVaD patients and 40 CNCs.

Main Results:

  • SVaD patients exhibited fewer outlets, reduced CAV and tCBF, and increased white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume and tCVR compared to CNCs.
  • Fewer outlets, higher Hachinski ischemic score (HIS), increased tCVR, and WMH volume were independently associated with SVaD.
  • A composite index of outlets, tCVR, and HIS effectively differentiated SVaD patients (AUC=0.943).

Conclusions:

  • Reduced outlets, elevated HIS, and increased tCVR are potential independent risk factors for SVaD.
  • A combination of these indexes reliably differentiates SVaD patients from CNCs.
  • The tCBF index may mediate the relationship between hemodynamic alterations and SVaD, with the CFD model offering non-invasive, patient-specific insights.
Abstract