Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Removing modifications to the New Zealand Early Warning Score- does ethnicity matter? A multimethod research design
Alison M Pirret1, Lesley M Kazula2
1Critical Care Complex, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; School of Nursing, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.
Background:
Previous research on a modified New Zealand Early Warning Score (M-NZEWS) used in predominately medical ward patients identified removing the modifications would significantly reduce the number of M-NZEWSs triggering the medical emergency team (MET), particularly in Māori patients.
Aim:
To firstly, explore the impact of removing the modifications from the M-NZEWS on medical and surgical ward patients' early warning score MET triggers and secondly, determine if the M-NZEWS MET triggers resulted in MET activations and if the MET activations were a result of M-NZEWS MET triggers.
Method:
The study used a multimethod research design. Phase one analysed ward electronic vital sign data and phase two analysed MET and critical care outreach data from the critical care outreach data base.
Results:
Data of 353 patients and 1004 M-NZEWS MET triggers were analysed. Removing the modifications would result in 26.9% fewer patients with MET triggers, with the biggest impact on Māori. Only 45.8% of M-NZEWS MET triggers were escalated to the MET with 58.9% escalated to critical care outreach. Review of the MET activations identified only 59.2% had M-NZEWSs triggering the MET recorded in the electronic vital sign system; however the critical care outreach data base identified most of the MET activations were because of M-NZEWS MET triggers.
Conclusion:
Removing the modifications would significantly reduce the number of MET triggers, particularly in Māori patients. Analysing solely electronic vital sign data may not reflect the number of medical emergency team triggers or activations.
Insights
Removing modifications to the modified New Zealand Early Warning Score (M-NZEWS) significantly reduces medical emergency team (MET) triggers, especially for Māori patients. Electronic vital sign data alone may not capture all MET activations.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Patient Safety
- Clinical Decision Support Systems
Background:
- Modified New Zealand Early Warning Score (M-NZEWS) modifications were previously found to increase Medical Emergency Team (MET) triggers in medical ward patients.
- A significant disparity in M-NZEWS triggers was noted among Māori patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of removing M-NZEWS modifications on MET triggers in both medical and surgical wards.
- To ascertain the correlation between M-NZEWS MET triggers, subsequent MET activations, and the accuracy of electronic vital sign data in reflecting these events.
Main Methods:
- A multimethod research design was employed, integrating electronic vital sign data analysis with MET and critical care outreach data.
- Phase one involved analyzing ward electronic vital sign data.
- Phase two focused on analyzing MET and critical care outreach databases.
Main Results:
- Removing M-NZEWS modifications would decrease patient MET triggers by 26.9%, with a disproportionately larger impact on Māori patients.
- Less than half (45.8%) of M-NZEWS MET triggers led to MET activation; 58.9% were escalated to critical care outreach.
- While electronic vital sign systems captured only 59.2% of MET activations, critical care outreach data confirmed M-NZEWS MET triggers as the primary cause for most activations.
Conclusions:
- Reverting M-NZEWS to its original form substantially reduces MET triggers, particularly benefiting Māori patients.
- Reliance solely on electronic vital sign data for tracking MET triggers and activations can be misleading, potentially underestimating the true incidence.
Related Concept Videos
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Surveys
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Statistical Significance
Regression Toward the Mean

