Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Convergent Evolution

Convergent Evolution

Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.

The Evidence for Evolution

The Evidence for Evolution

Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.

Optimal Foraging

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

Speciation Rates

Speciation Rates

Pollination and Flower Structure

Pollination and Flower Structure

Flowers are the reproductive, seed-producing structures of angiosperms. Typically, flowers consist of sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. Sepals and petals are the vegetative flower organs. Stamens and carpels are the reproductive organs.

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Collapsible scissored surfaces.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Reversible superdeformability of hiPSC epithelial cortinoids.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Rotational 3D printing of active-passive filaments and lattices with programmable shape morphing.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Postural control in an upright snake.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2026

Same author

Noise-enabled goal attainment in crowded collectives.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Morphogenesis and morphometry of brain folding patterns across species.

eLife·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Published on: February 18, 2021

Geometry and dynamics link form, function, and evolution of finch beaks.

Salem Al-Mosleh¹, Gary P T Choi^1,2, Arhat Abzhanov^3,4

¹John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

|November 9, 2021

Summary

Darwin's finches exhibit diverse beak shapes, explained by a simple parabolic geometry. This geometric model links beak form to function, aiding evolutionary and developmental understanding.

Keywords:

Darwin’s finches beaks evo–devo morphology

More Related Videos

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Published on: May 31, 2014

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Creating Avian Forebrain Chimeras to Assess Facial Development

Published on: February 18, 2021

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Assessing Species-specific Contributions To Craniofacial Development Using Quail-duck Chimeras

Published on: May 31, 2014

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton

Published on: May 7, 2016

Area of Science:

Evolutionary Biology
Biophysics
Morphometrics

Background:

Darwin's finches are a prime example of adaptive radiation.
Their beak diversity is key to understanding adaptation and speciation.
Quantifying beak morphology is crucial for functional and evolutionary insights.

Purpose of the Study:

To quantitatively analyze the 3D beak shapes of Darwin's finches.
To relate beak morphology to function and dietary adaptations.
To propose a model for the developmental origins of beak shape variation.

Main Methods:

Performed a 3D morphometric analysis of finch beaks.
Modeled beak shapes using transverse parabolas.
Applied principles from the theory of machines to quantify beak function.

Main Results:

Finches' beaks conform to a transverse parabolic shape.
Beak curvature increases linearly from base to tip.
Morphological variations correlate with dietary niches.

Conclusions:

A simple geometric model explains finch beak diversity.
Beak shape variation is linked to functional requirements and diet.
A cellular growth law can explain the morphogenesis of diverse beak shapes.