Advantages of multi-arm non-randomised sequentially allocated cohort designs for Phase II oncology trials

Helen Mossop1, Michael J Grayling1, Ferdia A Gallagher2

  • 1Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

British Journal of Cancer
|November 9, 2021
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

The Multi-Arm Sequential Trial with Efficient Recruitment (MASTER) design is more efficient for Phase II cancer trials. This adaptive design optimizes drug evaluation, especially with quick recruitment or delayed outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Oncology Drug Development
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Efficient Phase II trial designs are crucial for prioritizing promising cancer drugs.
  • Adaptive designs enhance efficiency but can be hampered by delayed patient response assessments.
  • Current methods require optimization for evaluating multiple treatment arms effectively.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficiency of three distinct trial designs for evaluating multiple treatment arms in Phase II oncology studies.
  • To introduce and evaluate the Multi-Arm Sequential Trial with Efficient Recruitment (MASTER) design.
  • To assess the impact of endpoint delay and recruitment speed on trial efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Simulation study comparing three trial designs: sequential single-arm trials, parallel multi-arm multi-stage, and the MASTER design.
  • The MASTER design involves sequential recruitment to treatment arms with interim analysis pauses.
  • Evaluation based on the time required to assess multiple new treatment arms.

Main Results:

  • Both the parallel multi-arm multi-stage and MASTER designs significantly outperform sequential single-arm trials.
  • The MASTER design demonstrates superior efficiency, particularly when facing endpoint delays or rapid patient recruitment.
  • MASTER design offers enhanced efficiency in evaluating multiple oncology treatments.

Conclusions:

  • The MASTER design is recommended as a highly efficient approach for non-comparative Phase II trials of multiple cancer treatments.
  • This adaptive design optimizes resource allocation and accelerates drug evaluation timelines.
  • MASTER design addresses key challenges in modern oncology clinical trials.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
3.7K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
22
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
9
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies01:11

Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies

Bioavailability studies are essential for understanding how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted in the body. These studies assess the extent and rate at which the active pharmaceutical agent becomes available at the site of action. The design of bioavailability studies can involve single-dose or multiple-dose regimens, each with distinct advantages and limitations.Single-dose studies are the preferred approach due to their simplicity and reduced drug exposure for...
19
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
9.7K
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
4.0K