Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025
Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Development of a multi-criteria decision-making-based assessment model for dental material selection: Engine-driven
Nurcan Deniz1, Ekim Onur Orhan2,3
1Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, 26040, Eskişehir, Turkey. nurcanatikdeniz@gmail.com.
This study proposes a validated assessment model with specific criteria and weights for selecting Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) instruments. This systematic approach aids dental practitioners in making objective decisions for NiTi instrument selection.
Area of Science:
- Dental materials science
- Biomaterials engineering
- Decision science
Background:
- Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) instruments are crucial in modern endodontics.
- Objective selection criteria for NiTi instruments are lacking, leading to inconsistent choices.
- A systematic approach is needed to evaluate and select NiTi instruments effectively.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose specific, evidence-based selection criteria for NiTi instruments.
- To develop and validate an objective assessment model for NiTi dental instruments.
- To enhance the decision-making process for dental practitioners regarding NiTi instruments.
Main Methods:
- The Delphi method was used to achieve expert consensus on selection criteria.
- Smart pairwise comparisons and Borda voting were employed for criterion ranking and weighting.
- Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) was utilized to develop the assessment model, with reliability and validity confirmed via simulation.
Main Results:
- A comprehensive set of weighted criteria for NiTi instrument assessment was successfully proposed.
- A validated assessment model was developed, integrating the defined criteria and their weights.
- The model provides a structured framework for evaluating different NiTi instrumentation systems.
Conclusions:
- The proposed assessment model offers a systematic, transparent, and reproducible method for NiTi instrument selection.
- This model can significantly aid dental practitioners and healthcare professionals in clinical decision-making.
- The framework serves as a reference for future multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) studies in medical materials science.
Related Concept Videos
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...