Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.3K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.3K
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

6.3K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
6.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

197
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
197
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

12.3K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
12.3K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

4.4K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
4.4K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Introducing information literacy and careers in librarianship to New York City high school students: a case report.

Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA·2026
Same author

Venoactive drugs for venous origin chronic pelvic pain in women: A systematic review.

Phlebology·2025
Same author

Comparative infection risk in CAR T vs bispecific antibodies in B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Blood advances·2025
Same author

Deciphering genomic codes using advanced natural language processing techniques: a scoping review.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2025
Same author

Risk of Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2024
Same author

Pulmonary artery catheter use and in-hospital outcomes in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.9K

Supporting Consensus Statements: Considerations and Recommendations for a Systematic Review Service.

Michelle R Demetres1, Drew N Wright1, Diana Delgado1

  • 1Samuel J. Wood Library & C.V. Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York City, USA.

Medical Reference Services Quarterly
|November 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Librarians can support consensus statement development by understanding their methodology, which differs from practice guidelines. This paper offers practical considerations for librarians assisting with these critical reviews.

Keywords:
Consensus statementsevidence synthesisevidence-based medicineservice deliverysystematic reviews

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

801

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.9K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.2K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

801

Area of Science:

  • Library and Information Science
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Health Sciences Research

Background:

  • Methodological rigor in consensus statements is increasingly scrutinized.
  • Librarians, with expertise in systematic reviews (SRs), are frequently involved in supporting consensus statement development.
  • The Weill Cornell Medicine Library's SR Service provides a practical case study.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define consensus statements.
  • To elucidate consensus statement methodology and differentiate it from practice guidelines.
  • To identify key considerations for librarians supporting consensus statement work.

Main Methods:

  • The paper draws upon the practical experience of the Weill Cornell Medicine Samuel J. Wood Library's SR Service.
  • It addresses three core questions concerning librarian support for consensus statements.
  • The methodology involves defining terms and comparing methodologies.

Main Results:

  • Consensus statements are documents establishing expert agreement on a topic.
  • Consensus methodology involves specific approaches to achieve agreement, distinct from practice guidelines.
  • Practical advice is provided for librarians to effectively support these initiatives.

Conclusions:

  • Librarians play a vital role in enhancing the methodological quality of consensus statements.
  • Understanding the nuances of consensus methodology is crucial for effective librarian support.
  • This work offers a framework for librarians engaging with consensus statement projects.