Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025
Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Left atrial appendage shape impacts on the left atrial flow hemodynamics: A numerical hypothesis generating study on
Lida Alinezhad1, Farzan Ghalichi1, Majid Ahmadlouydarab2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Biomechanics, Sahand University of Technology, Tabriz, Iran.
Background And Objectives:
The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the most common region for thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation (AF). Morphological parameters such as shape, size, and LAA volume can cause insufficient effectiveness of available therapeutic options. This study aimed to examine blood flow inside LAA and its removal effects. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations were carried out on two patients with different morphologies.
Methods:
Two patients' CT was used to reconstruct the 3D geometries of the left atrium (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA). Then, the geometries were refined in the mentioned software, and the LAA in some models was removed. Next, in generated 3D volume mesh, sinus rhythm (SR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) outflow velocity were imposed at the mitral valve as boundary conditions. Finally, CFD simulation was conducted to analyzing blood flow within LA with/without LA.
Results:
The results confirmed that velocity and vorticity decreased under AF conditions inside the LA domain for both patients. However, removing LAA may cause unpredictable consequences, due to different shape and volume of LAA. LAA removal had insignificant effects on velocity and vorticity within LA in SR-mitral outflow. However, removing LAA increased the blood flow rate by 9.15% and vorticity by 7.27% for patient one under AF rhythm (SR)-outflow. In contrast, for patient two, LAA removal in both AF and SR decreased velocity and vorticity within the LA domain. In SR-mitral outflow, velocity dropped by 18.8 %, and vorticity by 13.2%. Also, under AF velocity and vorticity decreased by 23.33% and 18.6% respectively. Meanwhile, the results indicated that the vorticity magnitude increased inside the LAA under AF associated with the risk of thrombus formation, particularly for patient one under AF. The distal part of LAA in both patients was the most common region for blood stasis because of the lowest velocity magnitude.
Conclusion:
Overall, the morphology of LAA could be the critical parameter to determine the possibility of thrombosis formation, particularly under AF conditions. High volume, low blood flow velocity and two-lobe-appendage are more likely to have blood stasis. Furthermore, the morphology difference can affect the LAA removal result and make it more complicated. So, it could be challenging to generalize LAA removal as a therapeutic option for different patients. The implication of this CFD observation needs more investigation.
