Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cavity design for class II composite restorations.

A Ben-Amar, Z Metzger, G Gontar

    The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
    |July 1, 1987
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The effect of gingival wall location on the marginal seal of class ii restorations prepared with a flowable bulk-fill resin-based composite.

    Journal of biological regulators and homeostatic agents·2018
    Same author

    Does root canal treatment in necrotic pulp or retreatment cases with periapical lesions require anaesthesia? An in vivo clinical study.

    International endodontic journal·2016
    Same author

    The diagnosis and conservative treatment of a complex type 3 dens invaginatus using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D plastic models.

    International endodontic journal·2012
    Same author

    Residual bacteria in root apices removed by a diagonal root-end resection: a histopathological evaluation.

    International endodontic journal·2008
    Same author

    Low-dose doxycycline inhibits bone resorption associated with apical periodontitis.

    International endodontic journal·2008
    Same author

    ["Flare-up" during endodontic treatment--etiology and management].

    Refu'at ha-peh veha-shinayim (1993)·2007
    Same journal

    Effects of prosthetic screw modifications and tightening conditions on mechanical outcomes in screw-retained implant restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
    Same journal

    Influence of silane-containing universal adhesives and separate silanization on lithium disilicate bond strength.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
    Same journal

    Clinical, radiographic, and esthetic outcomes of the socket shield technique versus conventional postextraction implant placement: A systematic review.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
    Same journal

    Response to Letter to the Editor regarding, "Dimensional accuracy and clinical adaptation of monolithic zirconia crowns…" and "Effect of finish line designs on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns".

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
    Same journal

    Risk factors in peri-implantitis: A narrative review.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
    Same journal

    Vat photopolymerization-printed zirconia veneered with porcelain: Mechanical properties, fatigue properties, and fractographic analysis.

    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
    See all related articles

    Posterior composite restorations require distinct preparation designs compared to amalgam. Key differences include narrower occlusal form, shallower depth, and specific proximal extensions for better access and finishing.

    Area of Science:

    • Dentistry
    • Restorative Dentistry
    • Dental Materials

    Background:

    • Traditional amalgam restorations have established preparation guidelines.
    • Composite resins possess different mechanical and handling properties compared to amalgam.
    • Optimizing preparation design is crucial for the longevity and success of posterior composite restorations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline specific preparation design modifications for posterior composite restorations.
    • To differentiate preparation techniques between composite and amalgam restorations.
    • To provide guidance for achieving predictable clinical outcomes with composite restorations.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative analysis of preparation design principles for composite versus amalgam.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification of critical preparation features: occlusal form, depth, proximal extensions, internal line angles, retention features, and margin beveling.
  • Evaluation of the impact of preparation design on visibility, probe access, and polishability.

    • Main Results:

    • Posterior composite preparations should be narrower and shallower than amalgam preparations.
    • Proximal extensions should be designed for visibility, probing, and polishing.
    • Internal line angles should be rounded, with retention grooves in specific proximal and gingival areas.
    • Beveling is recommended for proximal margins but not occlusal margins.

    Conclusions:

    • Preparation design for posterior composite restorations necessitates modifications from amalgam techniques.
    • Attention to occlusal form, proximal extensions, internal features, and margin beveling is essential for successful composite restorations.
    • Adherence to these modified preparation principles can enhance the clinical performance and durability of posterior composite restorations.