Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
Published on: September 27, 2019
Validation and application of a needs-based segmentation tool for cross-country comparisons
Lize Duminy1,2, Nirmali Ruth Sivapragasam3, David Bruce Matchar3,4
1Institute for Health Policy and Health Economics, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
Objective:
To compare countries' health care needs by segmenting populations into a set of needs-based health states.
Data Sources:
We used seven waves of the Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) panel survey data.
Study Design:
We developed the Cross-Country Simple Segmentation Tool (CCSST), a validated clinician-administered instrument for categorizing older individuals by distinct, homogeneous health and related social service needs. Using clinical indicators, self-reported physician diagnosis of chronic disease, and performance-based tests conducted during the survey interview, individuals were assigned to 1-5 global impressions (GI) segments and assessed for having any of the four identifiable complicating factors (CFs). We used Cox proportional hazard models to estimate the risk of mortality by segment. First, we show the segmentation cross-sectionally to assess cross-country differences in the fraction of individuals with different levels of medical needs. Second, we compare the differences in the rate at which individuals transition between those levels and death.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods:
We segmented 270,208 observations (from Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland) from 96,396 individuals into GI and CF categories.
Principal Findings:
The CCSST is a valid tool for segmenting populations into needs-based states, showing Switzerland with the lowest fraction of individuals in high medical needs segments, followed by Denmark and Sweden, and Poland with the highest fraction, followed by Italy and Israel. Comparing hazard ratios of transitioning between health states may help identify country-specific areas for analysis of ecological and cultural risk factors.
Conclusions:
The CCSST is an innovative tool for aggregate cross-country comparisons of both health needs and transitions between them. A cross-country comparison gives policy makers an effective means of comparing national health system performance and provides targeted guidance on how to identify strategies for curbing the rise of high-need, high-cost patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Levels of Use of a GIS
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections

