Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Coulomb Explosion Imaging as a Tool to Distinguish Between Stereoisomers
Published on: August 18, 2017
Large Inverted Singlet-Triplet Energy Gaps Are Not Always Favorable for Triplet Harvesting: Vibronic Coupling Drives
Fabian Dinkelbach1, Mario Bracker1, Martin Kleinschmidt1
1Institute of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Abstract:
Heptazine derivatives are promising dopants for electroluminescent devices. Recent studies raised the question whether heptazines exhibit a small regular or an inverted singlet-triplet (IST) gap. It was argued that the S1 ← T1 reverse intersystem crossing (RISC) is a downhill process in IST emitters and therefore does not require thermal activation, thus enabling efficient harvesting of triplet excitons. Rate constants were not determined in these studies. Modeling the excited-state properties of heptazine proves challenging because fluorescence and intersystem crossing (ISC) are symmetry-forbidden in first order. In this work, we present a comprehensive theoretical study of the photophysics of heptazine and its derivative HAP-3MF. The calculations of electronic excitation energies and vibronic coupling matrix elements have been conducted at the density functional theory/multireference configuration interaction (DFT/MRCI) level of theory. We have employed a finite difference approach to determine nonadiabatic couplings and derivatives of spin-orbit coupling and electric dipole transition matrix elements with respect to normal coordinate displacements. Kinetic constants for fluorescence, phosphorescence, internal conversion (IC), ISC, and RISC have been computed in the framework of a static approach. Radiative S1 ↔ S0 transitions borrow intensity mainly from optically bright E' π → π* states, while S1 ↔ T1 (R)ISC is mediated by E″ states of n → π* character. Test calculations show that IST gaps as large as those reported in the literature are counterproductive and slow down the S1 ← T1 RISC process. Using the adiabatic DFT/MRCI singlet-triplet splitting of -0.02 eV, we find vibronically enhanced ISC and RISC to be fast in the heptazine core compound. Nevertheless, its photo- and electroluminescence quantum yields are predicted to be very low because S1 → S0 IC efficiently quenches the luminescence. In contrast, fluorescence, IC, ISC, and RISC proceed at similar time scales in HAP-3MF.
More Related Videos
08:22Measurement of Ultrafast Vibrational Coherences in Polyatomic Radical Cations with Strong-Field Adiabatic Ionization
Published on: August 6, 2018
08:04Excitonic Hamiltonians for Calculating Optical Absorption Spectra and Optoelectronic Properties of Molecular Aggregates and Solids
Published on: May 27, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling