Habitability Is Binary, But It Is Used by Astrobiologists to Encompass Continuous Ecological Questions

The term "habitability" is pervasive throughout the space sciences and astrobiology literature and is broadly used to describe an environment's ability to support life. Here, we argue that, while it is fundamentally a binary matter whether an organism can persist in an environment or not, these binary assessments lead to continuous ecological measurements that are often collected under the umbrella term "habitability" by astrobiologists. Although the use of habitability in this way has provided a framework for those studying the potential of environments to support life, including comparative analyses between terrestrial and extraterrestrial environments, it can also generate confusion and limit interdisciplinary understanding. Namely, differing ecological metrics used as proxies for habitability can yield differing conclusions depending upon the metrics chosen. Therefore, we suggest that in this continuous sense, the terms habitable and habitability lose meaning unless the specific scientific question and biological metric chosen to address it are defined. As a corollary, the search for universal single metrics to make habitability assessments is not to be encouraged, and as we argue, attempting to do so would oversimply analyses of the ability of environments to support life.