Hemodynamic Effects of Permanent His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing Assessed by Two-Dimensional
Jedrzej Michalik1, Alicja Dabrowska-Kugacka2, Katarzyna Kosmalska3
1Kashubian Center for Heart and Vascular Diseases, Department of Cardiology and Interventional Angiology, Pomeranian Hospitals, 84-200 Wejherowo, Poland.
Insights
His bundle pacing (HBP) offers advantages over right ventricular pacing (RVP) in patients with conduction disorders. HBP preserves ventricular synchrony and improves cardiac function compared to RVP.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Pacing
Background:
- Atrioventricular conduction disorders necessitate pacing, with right ventricular pacing (RVP) being common.
- RVP can lead to dyssynchrony and adverse cardiac remodeling.
- His bundle pacing (HBP) is an alternative pacing strategy with potential benefits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term effects of HBP versus RVP on cardiac function and synchrony.
- To evaluate echocardiographic parameters, including global longitudinal strain (GLS) and peak systolic dispersion (PSD), after 6 months.
- To assess pacing parameters and QRS duration (QRSd) in both pacing groups.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving patients with atrioventricular conduction disorders and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- Patients were randomized to either RVP (n=26) or HBP (n=24).
- Evaluations included 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography for GLS and PSD, left atrial volume index (LAVI) and QRSd measurements, and sensing/pacing threshold testing at 1 day and 6 months post-implantation.
Main Results:
- HBP demonstrated stable GLS and decreasing PSD, indicating preserved ventricular synchrony.
- RVP showed a decrease in GLS and an increase in PSD, suggesting impaired synchrony.
- RVP resulted in longer QRSd and increased LAVI compared to HBP, which showed a decrease in LAVI.
Conclusions:
- His bundle pacing maintains ventricular synchrony and shows favorable remodeling compared to right ventricular pacing.
- HBP is a superior pacing strategy for patients with atrioventricular conduction disorders, offering better preservation of cardiac function.
- These findings support HBP as an alternative to RVP, particularly in patients concerned about long-term cardiac health.
Abstract:
We compared the effects of right ventricular (RVP; n = 26) and His bundle (HBP; n = 24) pacing in patients with atrioventricular conduction disorders and preserved LVEF. Postoperatively (1D), and after six months (6M), the patients underwent global longitudinal strain (GLS) and peak systolic dispersion (PSD) evaluation with 2D speckle-tracking echocardiography, assessment of left atrial volume index (LAVI) and QRS duration (QRSd), and sensing/pacing parameter testing. The RVP threshold was lower than the HBP threshold at 1D (0.65 ± 0.13 vs. 1.05 ± 0.20 V, p < 0.001), and then it remained stable, while the HBP threshold increased at 6M (1.05 ± 0.20 vs. 1.31 ± 0.30 V, p < 0.001). The RVP R-wave was higher than the HBP R-wave at 1D (11.52 ± 2.99 vs. 4.82 ± 1.41 mV, p < 0.001). The RVP R-wave also remained stable, while the HBP R-wave decreased at 6M (4.82 ± 1.41 vs. 4.50 ± 1.09 mV, p < 0.02). RVP QRSd was longer than HBP QRSd at 6M (145.0 ± 11.1 vs. 112.3 ± 9.3 ms, p < 0.001). The absolute value of RVP GLS decreased at 6M (16.32 ± 2.57 vs. 14.03 ± 3.78%, p < 0.001), and HBP GLS remained stable. Simultaneously, RVP PSD increased (72.53 ± 24.15 vs. 88.33 ± 30.51 ms, p < 0.001) and HBP PSD decreased (96.28 ± 33.99 vs. 84.95 ± 28.98 ms, p < 0.001) after 6 months. RVP LAVI increased (26.73 ± 5.7 vs. 28.40 ± 6.4 mL/m2, p < 0.05), while HBP LAVI decreased at 6M (30.03 ± 7.8 vs. 28.73 ± 8.7 mL/m2, p < 0.01). These results confirm that HBP does not disrupt ventricular synchrony and provides advantages over RVP.
More Related Videos
09:05Transthoracic Speckle Tracking Echocardiography for the Quantitative Assessment of Left Ventricular Myocardial Deformation
Published on: October 20, 2016
11:50High-frequency High-resolution Echocardiography: First Evidence on Non-invasive Repeated Measure of Myocardial Strain, Contractility, and Mitral Regurgitation in the Ischemia-reperfused Murine Heart
Published on: July 9, 2010
