Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Muscle Stimulation Frequency01:22

Muscle Stimulation Frequency

3.3K
The contraction strength of muscles is regulated by motor neurons, which modulate the frequency of action potentials dispatched to the motor units based on the body's requirements. This process of varying the muscle stimulation frequency allows muscles to contract with a force that is precisely tailored to the needs of the moment, whether lifting a feather or a heavy box.
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
3.3K
Motor Unit Stimulation01:20

Motor Unit Stimulation

2.5K
When the neuron of a motor unit fires an action potential, it triggers a series of events, leading to a twitch contraction in the muscle fibers. The process of excitation-contraction coupling is crucial in relaying the action potential to the muscle fibers.
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
2.5K
Design Example: Frog Muscle Response01:14

Design Example: Frog Muscle Response

364
A student is tasked to work on an intriguing experiment involving an RL (Resistor-Inductor) circuit to study the muscle response of a frog's leg to electrical stimulation. The RL circuit plays a crucial role in this experiment, providing the means to control and measure the electrical impulses that trigger muscle contraction.
When the switch connecting the RL circuit is closed, a brief muscle contraction is observed. This is because, at a steady state, the inductor acts like a short...
364

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Functional Electrical Stimulation Combined With Reactive Balance Training for Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

A pilot randomized controlled trial of neuromodulation-augmented balance training in people with multiple sclerosis: STIM-Balance Protocol.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Reorganization of fractal gait dynamics by auditory cueing with scale-dependent control.

Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)·2026
Same author

Comparison of methods for determining parameters related to ankle joint quasi-stiffness during quiet standing.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Temporal machine learning framework for diabetic foot ulcer healing trajectory prediction.

Biomedical engineering online·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of a Customized Rehabilitation Program for Adults With Post-Concussion Syndrome-A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.

The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
07:47

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

13.2K

A Generic Sequential Stimulation Adapter for Reducing Muscle Fatigue during Functional Electrical Stimulation.

Gongkai Ye1, Saima S Ali2, Austin J Bergquist1

  • 1KITE-Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M4G 3V9, Canada.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|November 13, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new Sequential (SEQ) stimulation adapter effectively reduces neuromuscular fatigue compared to conventional functional electrical stimulation (FES). This low-cost device enhances rehabilitation by preserving signal integrity up to 160 Hz.

Keywords:
fatigue reductionfunctional electrical stimulationrehabilitationsequential stimulation

More Related Videos

Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles
14:02

Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles

Published on: November 1, 2012

24.1K
Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity
11:34

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity

Published on: January 10, 2013

23.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function
07:47

Non-Invasive Electrical Brain Stimulation Montages for Modulation of Human Motor Function

Published on: February 4, 2016

13.2K
Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles
14:02

Ex Vivo Assessment of Contractility, Fatigability and Alternans in Isolated Skeletal Muscles

Published on: November 1, 2012

24.1K
Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity
11:34

Breathing-controlled Electrical Stimulation BreEStim for Management of Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity

Published on: January 10, 2013

23.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Rehabilitation Technology

Background:

  • Conventional functional electrical stimulation (FES) is limited by rapid neuromuscular fatigue.
  • Sequential (SEQ) stimulation, rotating pulses between electrodes, reduces fatigue but sees limited adoption.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate a novel Sequential (SEQ) adapter designed to increase the clinical use of SEQ stimulation.
  • To assess the adapter's ability to preserve signal integrity across various stimulation parameters.

Main Methods:

  • A battery-powered SEQ adapter was tested with a standard electrical stimulator.
  • Signal integrity was verified by varying pulse frequency (4-200 Hz), amplitude (10-100 mA), and duration (50-2000 μs).

Main Results:

  • The SEQ adapter maintained signal integrity within 1% error for tested parameters.
  • The device operated effectively up to a pulse frequency of 160 Hz, failing at 200 Hz.

Conclusions:

  • The SEQ adapter is a cost-effective solution to integrate SEQ stimulation into current rehabilitation practices.
  • This technology can help overcome limitations associated with FES-induced neuromuscular fatigue.