Positive predictive value and sensitivity of ICD-9-CM codes for identifying pediatric leukemia
Sheila Weinmann1,2, Melanie C Francisco1, Marilyn L Kwan3
1Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Insights
Using multiple ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes from electronic health records accurately identifies pediatric leukemia cases. Requiring four or more codes maximizes positive predictive value and sensitivity for epidemiologic studies.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Health Informatics
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Community-based epidemiologic studies require reliable methods for identifying pediatric leukemia.
- Electronic health records (EHRs) offer a potential data source, but validation is needed.
- International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes are used for diagnoses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the use of ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes for identifying pediatric leukemia cases in EHRs.
- To assess the added value of procedure codes for diagnosis and treatment in improving case identification.
- To determine the optimal number of diagnosis codes for accurate case ascertainment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective validation study using EHR data from six U.S. integrated health plans (1996-2015).
- Subjects included children and adolescents with at least 120 days of enrollment post-first leukemia code or tumor registry diagnosis.
- Gold standard: health system tumor registry and/or medical record review. Calculated positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity based on the number of ICD-9-CM codes.
Main Results:
- One or more ICD-9-CM codes yielded 99% sensitivity but only 70% PPV.
- Two or more codes improved PPV to 90% with 96% sensitivity.
- Four or more codes maximized PPV at 95% and maintained 93% sensitivity.
- Adding chemotherapy or bone marrow procedure codes had minimal impact on PPV or sensitivity.
Conclusions:
- Requiring multiple ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes (specifically four or more) from EHRs provides high PPV and sensitivity for identifying pediatric leukemia.
- This validated method can facilitate community-based epidemiologic studies of pediatric leukemia.
- Procedure codes do not significantly enhance the accuracy of case identification when diagnosis codes are used judiciously.
Background:
To facilitate community-based epidemiologic studies of pediatric leukemia, we validated use of ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes to identify pediatric leukemia cases in electronic medical records of six U.S. integrated health plans from 1996-2015 and evaluated the additional contributions of procedure codes for diagnosis/treatment.
Procedures:
Subjects (N = 408) were children and adolescents born in the health systems and enrolled for at least 120 days after the date of the first leukemia ICD-9-CM code or tumor registry diagnosis. The gold standard was the health system tumor registry and/or medical record review. We calculated positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity by number of ICD-9-CM codes received in the 120-day period following and including the first code. We evaluated whether adding chemotherapy and/or bone marrow biopsy/aspiration procedure codes improved PPV and/or sensitivity.
Results:
Requiring receipt of one or more codes resulted in 99% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98-100%) but poor PPV (70%; 95% CI: 66-75%). Receipt of two or more codes improved PPV to 90% (95% CI: 86-93%) with 96% sensitivity (95% CI: 93-98%). Requiring at least four codes maximized PPV (95%; 95% CI: 92-98%) without sacrificing sensitivity (93%; 95% CI: 89-95%). Across health plans, PPV for four codes ranged from 84-100% and sensitivity ranged from 83-95%. Including at least one code for a bone marrow procedure or chemotherapy treatment had minimal impact on PPV or sensitivity.
Conclusions:
The use of diagnosis codes from the electronic health record has high PPV and sensitivity for identifying leukemia in children and adolescents if more than one code is required.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...


