Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Probiotic Studies in Neonatal Mice Using Gavage
Published on: January 27, 2019
Routine Administration of a Multispecies Probiotic Containing Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus to Very Low Birth
Brian A Juber1,2, Timothy J Boly2, Graeme J Pitcher3
1Department of Pediatrics, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Insights
Routine probiotic use did not significantly alter necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) rates or mortality in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. This study found no impact on NEC incidence in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants either.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Gastroenterology
- Microbiome Research
Background:
- Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a major cause of morbidity in preterm infants.
- Current prevention and treatment strategies for NEC have seen limited advancement.
- Probiotics are being explored as a potential NEC intervention, but evidence in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants is limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of routine multispecies probiotic supplementation on NEC rates and pre-discharge mortality in very low birth weight (VLBW) and extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.
- To assess NEC incidence before and after the implementation of a hospital-wide probiotic protocol.
Main Methods:
- Single-center retrospective chart review of VLBW and ELBW infants.
- Analysis of modified Bell's stage ≥2a NEC and all-cause pre-discharge mortality.
- Comparison of data from the 4 years prior to and 5 years after routine probiotic initiation in 2015.
Main Results:
- Routine probiotic use did not significantly change NEC rates (2.1% vs. 1.5%) or all-cause mortality (8.4% vs. 7.4%) in VLBW infants.
- No significant impact on NEC incidence was observed in ELBW infants (1.6% vs. 4.1%).
- Analysis restricted to inborn infants also showed no significant effect of probiotics on NEC rates in VLBW or ELBW populations.
Conclusions:
- Contrary to some existing literature, this study found no significant benefit of routine multispecies probiotic administration in reducing NEC or mortality in VLBW infants.
- The findings suggest that routine probiotic use may not be an effective strategy for preventing NEC in this vulnerable population.
- Further research may be needed to clarify the role of probiotics in neonatal gut health and NEC prevention.
Abstract:
Background: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the leading cause of gastrointestinal morbidity in preterm infants, and prevention and treatment strategies have remained largely unchanged over the past several decades. As understanding of the microbiome has increased, probiotics have been hypothesized as a possible strategy for decreasing rates of NEC, and several studies have noted significant decreases in rates of NEC after initiation of probiotics in preterm infants. However, a recent AAP report cited caution on the use of probiotic use in part because studies of probiotic use in ELBW infants are lacking. As our unit began routine use of probiotics for all infants <33 weeks in 2015 and we are a leading institution for intact survival of ELBW infants, we attempted to answer if probiotic use can impact the rate of NEC in VLBW and ELBW infants. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of infants with modified Bell's stage ≥2a NEC for the 4 years prior to and 5 years after initiation of a protocol involving routine supplementation of a multispecies probiotic to premature infants at the University of Iowa, Stead Family Children's Hospital. The primary outcome measures were rates of modified Bell's stage ≥2a NEC and all-cause pre-discharge mortality at our institution before and after initiation of routine probiotic supplementation in 2015. Results: In our institution, neither the rates of modified Bell's stage ≥2a NEC, nor the rates of all-cause mortality were significantly altered in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants by the initiation of routine probiotic use (NEC rates pre-probiotic 2.1% vs. post-probiotic 1.5%; all-cause mortality rates pre-probiotic 8.4% vs. post-probiotic 7.4%). Characteristics of our two cohorts were overall similar except for a significantly lower 5-minute APGAR score in infants in the post-probiotic epoch (pre-probiotic 8 vs. post-probiotic 6 p = 0.0316), and significantly more infants in the post-probiotic epoch received probiotics (pre-probiotics 0% vs. post-probiotics 65%; p < 0.0001). Similarly, probiotic use had no impact on the incidence of NEC when we restricted our data to only extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (pre-probiotics 1.6% vs post-probiotics 4.1%). When we restricted our analysis to only inborn infants, probiotics still had no impact on NEC rates in VLBW infants (1.5% pre- and 1.1% post-probiotic, p = 0.61) or ELBW infants (2% pre- and 2.1% post-probiotic, p = 0.99) Conclusions: Contrary to other studies, we found no significant difference in rates of modified Bell's stage ≥2a NEC or all-cause pre-discharge mortality in VLBW infants following routine administration of a multispecies probiotic supplement.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Constipation-Predominant IBS
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children

