Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Prognostic value of tumour volume in patients with a poor Karnofsky performance status scale - a bicentric
Melanie Barz1, Julia Gerhardt2, Stefanie Bette3,4
1Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. melanie.barz@tum.de.
Backround:
Median overall survival (OS) after diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM) remains 15 months amongst patients receiving aggressive surgical resection, chemotherapy and irradiation. Treatment of patients with a poor preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) is still controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively assessed the outcome after surgical treatment in patients with a KPSS of ≤60%.
Methods:
We retrospectively included patients with a de-novo glioblastoma WHO °IV and preoperative KPSS ≤60%, who underwent surgery at two neurosurgical centres between September 2006 and March 2016. We recorded pre- and postoperative tumour volume, pre- and postoperative KPSS, OS, age and MGMT promoter status.
Results:
One hundred twenty-three patients (58 females/65 males, mean age 67.4 ± 13.4 years) met the inclusion criteria. Seventy-five of the 123 patients (61%) underwent surgical resection. 48/123 patients (39%) received a biopsy. The median preoperative and postoperative tumour volume of all patients was 33.0 ± 31.3 cm3 (IR 15.0-56.5cm3) and 3.1 ± 23.8 cm3 (IR 0.2-15.0 cm3), respectively. The median KPSS was 60% (range 20-60%) preoperatively and 50% (range 0-80%) postoperatively. Patients who received a biopsy showed a median OS for patients who received a biopsy only was 3.0 months (95% CI 2.0-4.0 months), compared to patients who had a resection and had a median OS of 8 months (95% CI 3.1-12.9 months). Age (p < 0.001, HR: 1.045 [95% CI 1.022-1.068]), postoperative tumour volume (p = 0.02, HR: 1.016 [95% CI 1.002-1.029]) and MGMT promotor status (p = 0.016, HR: 0.473 [95% CI 0.257-0.871]) were statistically significant in multivariate analysis. In subgroup analyses only age was shown as a significant prognostic factor in multivariate analyses for patients receiving surgery (p < 0.001, HR: 1.046 [95% CI 1.022-1.072]). In the biopsy group no significant prognostic factors were shown in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion:
GBM patients with a preoperative KPSS of ≤60% might profit from surgical reduction of tumour burden.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
07:32Author Spotlight: Investigating Immune Cell Dynamics in the Tumor Microenvironment — Challenges and Innovations in Cancer Prognosis
Published on: April 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...