Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions on endoscopic ultrasonography
Keiko Hirai1, Takamichi Kuwahara2,3, Kazuhiro Furukawa1
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8550, Japan.
Background:
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is useful for the differential diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SELs); however, not all of them are easy to distinguish. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the commonest SELs, are considered potentially malignant, and differentiating them from benign SELs is important. Artificial intelligence (AI) using deep learning has developed remarkably in the medical field. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of an AI system for classifying SELs on EUS images.
Methods:
EUS images of pathologically confirmed upper gastrointestinal SELs (GIST, leiomyoma, schwannoma, neuroendocrine tumor [NET], and ectopic pancreas) were collected from 12 hospitals. These images were divided into development and test datasets in the ratio of 4:1 using random sampling; the development dataset was divided into training and validation datasets. The same test dataset was diagnosed by two experts and two non-experts.
Results:
A total of 16,110 images were collected from 631 cases for the development and test datasets. The accuracy of the AI system for the five-category classification (GIST, leiomyoma, schwannoma, NET, and ectopic pancreas) was 86.1%, which was significantly higher than that of all endoscopists. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the AI system for differentiating GISTs from non-GISTs were 98.8%, 67.6%, and 89.3%, respectively. Its sensitivity and accuracy were significantly higher than those of all the endoscopists.
Conclusion:
The AI system, classifying SELs, showed higher diagnostic performance than that of the experts and may assist in improving the diagnosis of SELs in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Ultrasonography
During an ultrasonography procedure, a handheld device called...

