Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025
Isokinetic Robotic Device to Improve Test-Retest and Inter-Rater Reliability for Stretch Reflex Measurements in Stroke Patients with Spasticity
Published on: June 12, 2019
Test-Retest Reliability of a New Device Versus a Long-Arm Goniometer to Evaluate Knee Proprioception
Context:
Many methods used to evaluate knee proprioception have shortcomings that limit their use in clinical settings. Based on an inexpensive 3D camera, a new portable device was recently used to evaluate the joint position sense (JPS) of the knee joint. However, the test-retest reliability of the new method remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the new device and a long-arm goniometer for assessing knee JPS, and to compare the variability of the 2 methods.
Design:
Prospective observational study of the test-retest reliability of knee JPS measurements.
Methods:
Twenty-one healthy adults were tested in 2 sessions with a 1-week interval. Three target knee flexion angles (30°, 45°, and 60°) were reproduced in each session. Target and reproduced angles were measured with both methods. Intraclass correlation coefficients, standard error of the measurement, and Bland-Altman plots were used to quantify test-retest reliability. Paired t tests were used to compare knee JPS (absolute error of the target-reproduced angle) between the methods.
Results:
The new device (good to excellent intraclass correlation coefficients .74-.80; standard error of the measurement 0.52°-0.61°) demonstrated better test-retest reliability than the goniometer (poor to fair intraclass correlation coefficients .23-.43; standard error of the measurement 0.89°-2.07°) and better test-retest agreement (respective mean differences for the 30°, 45°, and 60° knee angles: 0.11°, 0.13°, and 0.41° for the new system; 0.84°, 1.52°, and 1.18° for the goniometer). The measurements (absolute errors of the target-reproduced angles) with the goniometer were significantly greater than those with the new device (P < .05); the SDs of repeated measurements with the goniometer (1.50°-2.41°) were greater than with the new device (1.08°-1.38°).
Conclusions:
Given that the new device has good reliability and sufficient precision, it is the better alternative for evaluating knee JPS. Goniometers should be used with caution to assess knee JPS.
