Determining macrophyte species richness and dark diversity sources - A novel approach to improve the biodiversity...

Biodiversity measures deliver valuable ecological information by reflecting a range of ecosystem processes. However, the accuracy of environmental assessment based on species patterns may often be affected by insufficient survey details. The comprehensive evaluation of plant taxa richness in rivers requires an extensive sampling effort. The use of Hill numbers and Chao estimators improves species diversity assessment based on a feasible number of samples. The aim of this work was to identify macrophyte groups, associated with various species traits, which are rich in species, as well as those whose detection is particularly difficult as it requires an exceptional sampling effort (sources of dark diversity). Analyses were performed with the use of Hill numbers and Chao estimators. It was shown that the field identification of all estimated macrophytes is particularly difficult for low trophy indicators and generally submerged plants, as well as for small-leaved species. A field survey encompassing the full (expected) macrophyte diversity encountered within a river is easiest to perform in the case of free-floating plants and large-leaved macrophytes, as well as for species with high trophic tolerance. The study proved that ecological assessment of rivers based on a small number of sampling units may lead to incorrect diversity estimates. Conversely, the estimation of diversity patterns at the level of the Shannon and Simpson indices does not require extensive sampling, and the extrapolation approach is not needed. The effectiveness of diversity assessment in fluvial ecosystems can be increased by extrapolation of gray diversity which can be considered in planning of monitoring programs. Moreover even estimated dark diversity bight be already efficient to identify ecological pattern and when comparing biodiversity across regions and ecosystems.