Prognostic Scores for Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion strokes (LVOS) presents several treatment challenges. We provide a summary of existing tools for patient selection (pre-EVT tools) and for prognostication of long-term outcomes following reperfusion therapy (post-EVT tools).

Recently published randomized trials demonstrated superiority of EVT over medical therapy alone for LVOS. Uniform patient selection paradigms based on demographic, clinical, and radiographic variables are not completely standardized, leading to variability in patient selection for EVT for LVOS. Post-EVT, an accurate assessment of long-term prognosis is critical in the decision-making process.

Prognostic scores can serve as useful adjuncts to facilitate clinical decision-making during early management of patients with ischemic stroke, particularly those with LVOS. The acute management of LVOS comprises rapid clinical assessment, triage, and cerebrovascular imaging, followed by evaluation for candidacy for thrombolysis and EVT. Pre-EVT prognostic tools that accurately predict the likelihood of benefit from EVT may guide reliable, efficient, and cost-effective patient selection. Following EVT, severe stroke deficits and subacute poststroke complications that portend a poor prognosis may warrant invasive therapies. Clinical decisions regarding these treatment options involve careful discussions between providers and patient families, and are also based on prognosis provided by the treating clinician. Reliable post-EVT prognostic tools can facilitate this by providing accurate and objective prognostic information. Several prognostic tools have been developed and validated in the literature, some of which may be applicable in the pre-EVT and post-EVT settings, although clinical utility and application varies. Validation in contemporary datasets as well as implementation and impact studies are needed before these scales can be used to guide clinical decisions for individual patients.