Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

In Vitro Evaluation of The Effects Of Er,Cr:YSGG and Diode Lasers Used on Titanium Cylinder
Published on: June 6, 2025
Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation in Comparison with Different Irrigation Systems for Cleaning the Apical Root Canal
Nyein Pyae Sone Aung1,2, Satoshi Watanabe1, Takashi Okiji1
1Division of Oral Health Sciences, Department of Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Bunkyo-ku, Japan.
Abstract:
To evaluate the effectiveness of erbium:yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser-activated irrigation (LAI) for cleaning the apical root canal area beyond a ledge. This was the first study that evaluated the efficacy of LAI in debris and smear layer removal from such hard-to-reach canal areas in human teeth. Eighty-eight human maxillary molars with either a mesiobuccal or distobuccal canal with 25°-35° curvature and mature apices were used. Following instrumentation to a size 25/0.02 taper, a ledge was created at 2.2 ± 0.7 mm short of the apex and checked using microcomputed tomography. Samples were divided into four groups: syringe irrigation (SI), ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI), agitation with the XP-endo Finisher (XP), and LAI. Each group was subdivided based on the irrigation regimen: 9 mL of 6% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and 6 mL of 6% NaOCl +3 mL of 14.3% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (n = 11). The apical 1-mm region was examined using scanning electron microscopy to evaluate the remaining debris and smear layer. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test (a = 0.05). Regardless of the irrigants used, LAI showed significantly lower smear layer scores than SI and XP (p < 0.05), with insignificant difference as compared with UAI. LAI showed significantly better debris removal than SI (p < 0.05) when NaOCl alone was used. In the apical area of ledged canals, the cleaning efficacy of Er:YAG LAI with/without EDTA was higher than SI and XP, but was comparable with UAI. Clinical Trial Registration number D2014-33.
More Related Videos
06:36Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
06:06Adjunctive Diode Laser Therapy and Probiotic Lactobacillus Therapy in the Treatment of Periodontitis and Peri-Implant Disease
Published on: May 9, 2022