Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Investigations on Alterations of Hippocampal Circuit Function Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Published on: November 19, 2012
Trauma-Focused Mitigation Testimony in Capital Sentencing Hearings
Julie Goldenson1, Stanley L Brodsky2
1Dr. Goldsenson is Clinical and Forensic Psychologist, Assistant Professor at the University of Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Dr. Brodsky is Clinical and Forensic Psychologist, Tuscaloosa, AL. j.goldenson@utoronto.ca biminip@gmail.com.
Abstract:
When capital trials of convicted defendants reach the sentencing phase, forensic mental health experts often testify as part of mitigation evidence. Three aspects of such testimony hold particular promise. First, developmental traumas in the lives of the defendants are especially well conceptualized in terms of complex posttraumatic stress disorder, as described in the ICD-11. Second, Cunningham's framework, which critically examines the impact of harmful and protective factors over the course of a defendant's development, allows for an examination of moral culpability apart from legal culpability. Third, specific training on trauma and its effects on personality and psychopathology allows forensic mental health professionals to more skillfully complete trauma mitigation evaluations.
Related Concept Videos
Traumatic Memory
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information...
Torts II
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Symptoms and Behavioral Manifestations
A spectrum of distressing symptoms characterizes PTSD. Recurrent flashbacks, where individuals involuntarily relive traumatic events,...
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.

