Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Fitting and Cross-Validating Cox Models to Censored Big Data With Missing Values Using Extensions of Partial Least
Frédéric Bertrand1,2, Myriam Maumy-Bertrand1,2
1LIST3N, Université de Technologie de Troyes, Troyes, France.
Standard cross-validation methods fail for big data Cox models with missing values using partial least squares extensions. New criteria improve performance, enabling robust analysis of complex datasets.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Computational Statistics
- Big Data Analytics
Background:
- Fitting Cox models in big data settings with missing values is computationally challenging.
- Existing analytic tools struggle with the volume, intensity, and complexity of big data.
- Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression extensions offer potential for high-dimensional Cox models, including those with missing data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of standard cross-validation (CV) criteria for PLS extensions of Cox models in big data.
- To identify and validate new CV criteria that perform reliably with these advanced models.
- To enhance the performance of PLS-based Cox models through improved hyperparameter selection.
Main Methods:
- Simulation studies using three distinct data generation algorithms.
- Evaluation of over a dozen cross-validation criteria, including AUC and prediction error-based methods.
- Development and application of sparse group extensions for PLS Cox models and a new performance metric (integrated R Schmid Score weighted).
Main Results:
- Standard cross-validation schemes (naive and van Houwelingen) demonstrate failure when applied to PLS extensions of Cox models.
- Several newly evaluated cross-validation criteria effectively select an appropriate number of components.
- Benchmark reanalysis using the validated CV criteria shows enhanced performance of PLS-based Cox models.
Conclusions:
- Traditional cross-validation methods are unreliable for hyperparameter tuning in PLS-extended Cox models for big data.
- The proposed cross-validation criteria offer a robust solution for selecting hyperparameters, leading to improved model performance.
- New sparse group extensions and performance metrics further advance the utility of PLS for complex survival data analysis.
More Related Videos
04:35Development of an Individual-Tree Basal Area Increment Model using a Linear Mixed-Effects Approach
Published on: July 3, 2020
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Censoring Survival Data
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Clearance Models: Noncompartmental Models
The noncompartmental approach capitalizes on extensive sampling data, correlating the volume of distribution to systemic exposure and the administered dosage. This method enables...
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are...
Residuals and Least-Squares Property
If the observed data point lies above the line, the residual is positive, and the line underestimates the actual data value for y. If the observed data point lies below the line, the residual is negative, and the line overestimates the actual data value for y.
The process of fitting the best-fit...