Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2025

Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
Published on: February 10, 2015
Estimating Facet Joint Apposition with Specimen-Specific Computer Models of Subaxial Cervical Spine Kinematics
Ryan D Quarrington1, Darcy W Thompson-Bagshaw2,3, Claire F Jones2,3
1Adelaide Spinal Research Group, Centre for Orthopaedic & Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Level 7, Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia. ryan.quarrington@adelaide.edu.au.
Abstract:
Computational models of experimental data can provide a noninvasive method to estimate spinal facet joint biomechanics. Existing models typically consider each vertebra as one rigid-body and assume uniform facet cartilage thickness. However, facet deflection occurs during motion, and cervical facet cartilage is nonuniform. Multi rigid-body computational models were used to investigate the effect of specimen-specific cartilage profiles on facet contact area estimates. Twelve C6/C7 segments underwent non-destructive intervertebral motions. Kinematics and facet deflections were measured. Three-dimensional models of the vertebra and cartilage thickness estimates were obtained from pre-test CT data. Motion-capture data was applied to two model types (2RB: C6, C7 vertebrae each one rigid body; 3RB: left and right C6 posterior elements, and C7 vertebrae, each one rigid body) and maximum facet mesh penetration was compared. Constant thickness cartilage (CTC) and spatially-varying thickness cartilage (SVTC) profiles were applied to the facet surfaces of the 3RB model. Cartilage apposition area (CAA) was compared. Linear mixed-effects models were used for all quantitative comparisons. The 3RB model significantly reduced penetrating mesh elements by accounting for facet deflections (p = 0.001). The CTC profile resulted in incongruent facet articulation, whereas realistic congruence was observed for the SVTC profile. The SVTC profile demonstrated significantly larger CAA than the CTC model (p < 0.001).
Related Concept Videos
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry
Articulations of the Vertebral Column
Method of Joints: Problem Solving II
General Case of Eccentric Axial Loading
Consider a member subjected to equal and opposite forces that are applied along a line that does not coincide with the member's neutral axis. In unsymmetrical...
Overview of the Axial Skeleton
The axial skeleton of the...
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...

