Blue, green, and grey water footprints assessment for paddy irrigation-drainage system

Water footprint (WF) quantifies the impact of paddy field evapotranspiration (ET) and non-point source pollution on water resources and is an evaluation index for water sustainability. However, it is difficult to measure accurately using the existing method, which is based on parameter assumption without considering the field water conditions. In this study, a generic and physically based method for blue, green, and grey water accounting in paddy rice cultivation is introduced. We conducted field experiments using the common flood irrigation (CFI) and water-saving irrigation (SWI) modes in Nanjing, East China. By tracing the sources of ET and the migration process of multiple pollutants (TN, TP, NH₄⁺-N, and NO₃^--N), the characteristics of blue-green water consumption and the actual amount of water required to dilute pollutants at different growth stages of rice under CFI and SWI were analyzed. The WF of paddy rice was 1000 m³/t (49% WF_green, 17% WF_blue, 34% WF_grey) and 910 m³/t (50% WF_green, 10% WF_blue, 40% WF_grey) for CFI and SWI, respectively. The WF for paddy rice production was reduced by approximately 9% under SWI compared to CFI, with declines of 47% for WF_blue and 8% for WF_green. The SWI mode changed the ratio of blue to green water fluxes in field water by reducing irrigation during non-critical periods, and green water was used preferentially to enhance its utility. This conceptual method is the first to describe the formation mechanism of blue, green, and grey WFs in paddy systems. It can be extended to different scales and agro-ecosystems that show the influence of crop cultivation on water resources.