Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adjusting for hard and easy graders.

D W Chambers1

  • 1Department of Community Dentistry, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA 94115.

Journal of Dental Education
|December 1, 1987
PubMed
Summary

A new statistical method can remove rater bias in dental education evaluations. This technique improves the prediction of student future performance compared to traditional scoring methods.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Validity of the American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index and the Peer Assessment Rating Index for comprehensive evaluation of malocclusion severity.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2017
Same author

Can performance on summative evaluation of wax-added dental anatomy projects be better predicted from the combination of supervised and unsupervised practice than from supervised practice alone?

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2015
Same author

Does our research tool kit equip us to make generalisable claims about dental education?

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2012
Same author

Association amongst factors thought to be important by instructors in dental education and perceived effectiveness of these instructors by students.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2004
Same author

Peer review.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2002
Same author

Red beads and funnels.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2002

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Psychometrics
  • Dental Education

Background:

  • Rater training and criterion-anchored systems partially reduce private rater standards in dental education.
  • A persistent challenge is the subjective bias introduced by individual raters' private standards.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and validate a statistical method for removing rater bias in educational assessments.
  • To enhance the predictive validity of student evaluation scores.

Main Methods:

  • A novel statistical technique was developed to normalize rater scores, effectively removing bias from private standards.
  • The normalized scores were compared against raw scores for their ability to predict future student performance.

Main Results:

  • Scores normalized using the described statistical method were significantly better predictors of students' future performance than raw scores.
  • The technique demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in predictive validity.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed statistical method offers a viable solution for mitigating rater bias in dental education.
  • This approach enhances the reliability and predictive power of student assessments, leading to more accurate evaluations of future performance.

Related Experiment Videos