Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Automated Acoustic Dispensing for the Serial Dilution of Peptide Agonists in Potency Determination Assays
Published on: November 10, 2016
Automated unit dose dispensing systems producing individually packaged and labelled drugs for inpatients: a
Kaisa Hänninen1,2, Hanne Katriina Ahtiainen2,3, Eeva Maria Suvikas-Peltonen4
1Hospital Pharmacy, Central Finland Hospital Nova, Jyvaskyla, Finland kaisa.hanninen@ksshp.fi.
Objectives:
Pharmacy automation is increasing in hospitals. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate the literature on automated unit dose dispensing systems (UDDS) producing individually packaged and labelled drugs for inpatients.
Methods:
The search was conducted on eight electronic databases, including Scopus, Medline Ovid, and Cinahl, and limited to peer reviewed articles with English abstracts published 2000-2020. Studies were included in the review if drug dispensing was performed by an automated UDDS where individually packaged and labelled unit doses were subsequently assembled patient specifically for inpatients. All outcomes related to UDDS functionality were included with specific interest in medication safety, cost-efficiency and stock management. Outcomes were categorised and results synthesised qualitatively.
Results:
664 publications were screened, one article identified manually, resulting in eight included articles. Outcomes of the studies were categorised as medication administration errors (MAEs), dispensing errors, costs and cost-effectiveness. Studies showed that automated UDDS reduced significantly MAEs of inpatients compared with traditional ward stock system (WSS), especially when UDs were dispensed patient specifically by unit dose dispensing robot. Patient specific drug dispensing with automated UDDS was very accurate. Of three different automated medication systems (AMSs), patient specific AMS (psAMS) was the most cost-effective and complex AMS (cAMS) the most expensive system across all error types due to the higher additional investments and operation costs of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs). None of the studies investigated the impact on the medication management process such as efficiency, costs and stock management as primary outcome.
Conclusions:
UDDS improved patient safety. However, automation is a costly investment and the implementation process is complex and time consuming. Further controlled studies are needed on the clinical and economical outcomes of automated UDDS to produce reliable knowledge for hospital decision makers on the cost-benefit of the investment and to support decision making.
Related Concept Videos
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Dosage Regimens: Designs and Approaches
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
Drug Accumulation During Multiple Dosing: Intermittent IV Infusions
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters

