Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
[Points for Evaluating Japanese Subgroup in the Multi-Regional Clinical Trial]
1Office of New Drug V, Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency(PMDA).
Abstract:
While the multi-regional clinical trial may accelerate the worldwide development and contribute to avoiding drug lag, differences in the results of efficacy and safety/tolerability among the regions are observed occasionally. These differences complicate the evaluation of clinical value of the study drug. To be able to evaluate consistency of treatment effects across regions, possible intrinsic and extrinsic ethnic factors should be considered at the planning of the study. Although some differences of therapeutic effects across the regions are found, these differences can be attributed to differences in intrinsic or extrinsic factors. Consistency of the efficacy and safety of the anti-cancer drug across the regional subgroups and entire population should be comprehensively examined in the multi-regional clinical trial.
More Related Videos
05:58Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for the Genetic Variation in a Sporadic Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Patient Using the Chip-in-a-tube Format
Published on: August 20, 2018
05:16Characterizing Exon Skipping Efficiency in DMD Patient Samples in Clinical Trials of Antisense Oligonucleotides
Published on: May 7, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications