Are knowledge- and belief-reasoning automatic, and is this the right question?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Andrew D R Surtees1, Andrew R Todd2
1School of Psychology, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Children's Hospital, Edgbaston, BirminghamB15 2TT, UKA.Surtees@Bham.ac.ukhttps://www.birmingham.ac.uk/staff/profiles/psychology/surtees-andrew.aspx.
Abstract:
Phillips et al. conclude that current evidence supports knowledge-, but not belief-reasoning as being automatic. We suggest four reasons why this is an oversimplified answer to a question that might not have a clear-cut answer: (1) knowledge and beliefs can be incompletely equated to perceptual states, (2) sensitivity to mental states does not necessitate representation, (3) automaticity is not a single categorical feature, and (4) how we represent others' minds is dependent on social context.
More Related Videos
05:47Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
Published on: June 13, 2025
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
The Availability Heuristic
Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Inductive Reasoning
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior