Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 12, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Lessons learned: Assessing team creation by personality inventories in pharmacy students
Apryl N Anderson1, Julie A Patterson1, Krista Donohoe1
1Department of Pharmacotherapy and Outcomes Science, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Pharmacy, 410 N. 12th Street, Box 980533, Richmond, VA 23298, United States of America.
Stratifying teams by personality strengths did not significantly impact student performance or perceptions in team-based learning compared to random assignment. Further research is needed to determine optimal team formation strategies.
Area of Science:
- Educational research
- Pharmacy education
- Team dynamics
Background:
- Effective team formation is crucial for team-based learning (TBL) success.
- Stratifying students by resources is recommended, but optimal team creation methods for TBL remain unclear.
- This study explored personality-based stratification versus randomization in pharmacy TBL.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of team stratification by personality strengths on student performance in graded activities and peer evaluations.
- To compare student perceptions of team dynamics between strength-stratified and randomized teams.
- To identify lessons learned and research considerations for future TBL team creation studies.
Main Methods:
- Compared team stratification by CliftonStrengths domains against randomization within the same cohort across two semesters.
- Analyzed student performance on graded team activities and peer evaluations.
- Assessed student perceptions of team dynamics.
Main Results:
- The distribution of CliftonStrengths domains was similar between strength-stratified and randomized teams.
- Negligible differences were observed in student performance and perceptions of team dynamics.
- The study's methodology was limited by the homogeneity of student strengths and the small variation in team composition.
Conclusions:
- Stratification by personality strengths did not yield significantly different outcomes compared to randomization in this TBL setting.
- Methodological limitations impacted the ability to draw definitive conclusions.
- Future studies should consider diverse stratification methods, control groups, and multiple cohorts for robust findings.
More Related Videos
06:02Evaluating Usability Aspects of a Mixed Reality Solution for Immersive Analytics in Industry 4.0 Scenarios
Published on: October 6, 2020
07:31A Computerized Functional Skills Assessment and Training Program Targeting Technology Based Everyday Functional Skills
Published on: February 13, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Cultural Influences on Personality
Five-Factor Theory of Personality
Openness reflects creativity, curiosity, and openness to new experiences. Individuals scoring high in openness are imaginative, have a wide range of interests, and are independent...
Introduction to Personality Psychology
Early Theories of Personality
The study of...
Implicit Personality Theories
Factors Influencing Attraction VI: Personality Traits